[PATCH v2 1/2] irqchip: stm32: Optimizes and cleans up stm32-exti irq_domain

[Ludovic BARRE]

hi Radoslaw

The gpio-keys tests it's now functional on H7, great.
However the gpio-key test only the bank1 (like stm32f429).
Like the H7 introduce the multi-bank management,
we must perform complementary test.

comment below about ack in handler

On 02/23/2018 09:31 AM, Radoslaw Pietrzyk wrote:
> - discards setting handle_simple_irq handler for hierarchy interrupts
> - removes acking in chained irq handler as this is done by
> irq_chip itself inside handle_edge_irq
> - removes unneeded irq_domain_ops.xlate callback
> 
> Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Pietrzyk <radoslaw.pietrzyk at gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c | 13 -------------
>   1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> index 36f0fbe..8013a87 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> @@ -79,13 +79,6 @@ static unsigned long stm32_exti_pending(struct irq_chip_generic *gc)
>   	return irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->pr_ofst);
>   }
>   
> -static void stm32_exti_irq_ack(struct irq_chip_generic *gc, u32 mask)
> -{
> -	const struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank = gc->private;
> -
> -	irq_reg_writel(gc, mask, stm32_bank->pr_ofst);
> -}
> -
>   static void stm32_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
>   {
>   	struct irq_domain *domain = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> @@ -106,7 +99,6 @@ static void stm32_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
>   			for_each_set_bit(n, &pending, IRQS_PER_BANK) {
>   				virq = irq_find_mapping(domain, irq_base + n);
>   				generic_handle_irq(virq);
> -				stm32_exti_irq_ack(gc, BIT(n));

the while loop " while ((pending = " has been introduce while original
upstream of this driver in V2 to V3
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/604190/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/665242/

the "ack" is needed to acknowledge the irq which are handled and which 
is not the original irq for which we enter.

>   			}
>   		}
>   	}
> @@ -176,16 +168,12 @@ static int stm32_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
>   static int stm32_exti_alloc(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
>   			    unsigned int nr_irqs, void *data)
>   {
> -	struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
>   	struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = data;
>   	irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
>   
>   	hwirq = fwspec->param[0];
> -	gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(d, hwirq);
>   
>   	irq_map_generic_chip(d, virq, hwirq);
> -	irq_domain_set_info(d, virq, hwirq, &gc->chip_types->chip, gc,
> -			    handle_simple_irq, NULL, NULL);

I see if it is not disturb the multi-bank.

>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> @@ -200,7 +188,6 @@ static void stm32_exti_free(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
>   
>   struct irq_domain_ops irq_exti_domain_ops = {
>   	.map	= irq_map_generic_chip,
> -	.xlate	= irq_domain_xlate_onetwocell,
>   	.alloc  = stm32_exti_alloc,
>   	.free	= stm32_exti_free,
>   };
> 

BR
Ludo