[PATCH v2 1/8] [PATCH 1/8] drivers/peci: Add support for PECI bus driver core
Jae Hyun Yoo
jae.hyun.yoo at linux.intel.com
Wed Feb 21 12:31:24 PST 2018
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for sharing your time to review it. Please check my answers inline.
On 2/21/2018 9:04 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> +static int peci_locked_xfer(struct peci_adapter *adapter,
>> + struct peci_xfer_msg *msg,
>> + bool do_retry,
>> + bool has_aw_fcs)
>> +{
>> + ktime_t start, end;
>> + s64 elapsed_ms;
>> + int rc = 0;
>> +
>> + if (!adapter->xfer) {
>> + dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "PECI level transfers not supported\n");
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (in_atomic() || irqs_disabled()) {
>
> Hi Jae
>
> Is there a real need to do transfers in atomic context, or with
> interrupts disabled?
>
Actually, no. Generally, this function will be called in sleep-able
context so this code is for an exceptional case handling.
I'll rewrite this code like below:
if (in_atomic() || irqs_disabled()) {
dev_dbg(&adapter->dev,
"xfer in non-sleepable context is not supported\n");
return -EWOULDBLOCK;
}
And then, will add a sleep call into the below loop.
I know that in_atomic() call is not recommended in driver code but some
driver codes still use it since there is no alternative way at this
time, AFAIK. Please tell me if there is a better solution.
>> + rt_mutex_trylock(&adapter->bus_lock);
>> + if (!rc)
>> + return -EAGAIN; /* PECI activity is ongoing */
>> + } else {
>> + rt_mutex_lock(&adapter->bus_lock);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (do_retry)
>> + start = ktime_get();
>> +
>> + do {
>> + rc = adapter->xfer(adapter, msg);
>> +
>> + if (!do_retry)
>> + break;
>> +
>> + /* Per the PECI spec, need to retry commands that return 0x8x */
>> + if (!(!rc && ((msg->rx_buf[0] & DEV_PECI_CC_RETRY_ERR_MASK) ==
>> + DEV_PECI_CC_TIMEOUT)))
>> + break;
>> +
>> + /* Set the retry bit to indicate a retry attempt */
>> + msg->tx_buf[1] |= DEV_PECI_RETRY_BIT;
>> +
>> + /* Recalculate the AW FCS if it has one */
>> + if (has_aw_fcs)
>> + msg->tx_buf[msg->tx_len - 1] = 0x80 ^
>> + peci_aw_fcs((u8 *)msg,
>> + 2 + msg->tx_len);
>> +
>> + /* Retry for at least 250ms before returning an error */
>> + end = ktime_get();
>> + elapsed_ms = ktime_to_ms(ktime_sub(end, start));
>> + if (elapsed_ms >= DEV_PECI_RETRY_TIME_MS) {
>> + dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "Timeout retrying xfer!\n");
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + } while (true);
>
> So you busy loop to 1/4 second? How about putting a sleep in here so
> other things can be done between each retry.
>
> And should it not return -ETIMEDOUT after that 1/4 second?
>
Yes, you are right. I'll rewrite this code like below after adding the
above change:
/**
* Retry for at least 250ms before returning an error.
* Retry interval guideline:
* No minimum < Retry Interval < No maximum
* (recommend 10ms)
*/
end = ktime_get();
elapsed_ms = ktime_to_ms(ktime_sub(end, start));
if (elapsed_ms >= DEV_PECI_RETRY_TIME_MS) {
dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "Timeout retrying xfer!\n");
rc = -ETIMEDOUT;
break;
}
usleep_range(DEV_PECI_RETRY_INTERVAL_MS * 1000,
(DEV_PECI_RETRY_INTERVAL_MS * 1000) + 1000);
>> +static int peci_scan_cmd_mask(struct peci_adapter *adapter)
>> +{
>> + struct peci_xfer_msg msg;
>> + u32 dib;
>> + int rc = 0;
>> +
>> + /* Update command mask just once */
>> + if (adapter->cmd_mask & BIT(PECI_CMD_PING))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + msg.addr = PECI_BASE_ADDR;
>> + msg.tx_len = GET_DIB_WR_LEN;
>> + msg.rx_len = GET_DIB_RD_LEN;
>> + msg.tx_buf[0] = GET_DIB_PECI_CMD;
>> +
>> + rc = peci_xfer(adapter, &msg);
>> + if (rc < 0) {
>> + dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "PECI xfer error, rc : %d\n", rc);
>> + return rc;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dib = msg.rx_buf[0] | (msg.rx_buf[1] << 8) |
>> + (msg.rx_buf[2] << 16) | (msg.rx_buf[3] << 24);
>> +
>> + /* Check special case for Get DIB command */
>> + if (dib == 0x00) {
>> + dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "DIB read as 0x00\n");
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!rc) {
>> + /**
>> + * setting up the supporting commands based on minor rev#
>> + * see PECI Spec Table 3-1
>> + */
>> + dib = (dib >> 8) & 0xF;
>> +
>> + if (dib >= 0x1) {
>> + adapter->cmd_mask |= BIT(PECI_CMD_RD_PKG_CFG);
>> + adapter->cmd_mask |= BIT(PECI_CMD_WR_PKG_CFG);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (dib >= 0x2)
>> + adapter->cmd_mask |= BIT(PECI_CMD_RD_IA_MSR);
>> +
>> + if (dib >= 0x3) {
>> + adapter->cmd_mask |= BIT(PECI_CMD_RD_PCI_CFG_LOCAL);
>> + adapter->cmd_mask |= BIT(PECI_CMD_WR_PCI_CFG_LOCAL);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (dib >= 0x4)
>> + adapter->cmd_mask |= BIT(PECI_CMD_RD_PCI_CFG);
>> +
>> + if (dib >= 0x5)
>> + adapter->cmd_mask |= BIT(PECI_CMD_WR_PCI_CFG);
>> +
>> + if (dib >= 0x6)
>> + adapter->cmd_mask |= BIT(PECI_CMD_WR_IA_MSR);
>
> Lots of magic numbers here. Can they be replaced with #defines. Also,
> it looks like a switch statement could be used, with fall through.
>
I agree. Will rewrite it.
>> +
>> + adapter->cmd_mask |= BIT(PECI_CMD_GET_TEMP);
>> + adapter->cmd_mask |= BIT(PECI_CMD_GET_DIB);
>> + adapter->cmd_mask |= BIT(PECI_CMD_PING);
>> + } else {
>> + dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "Error reading DIB, rc : %d\n", rc);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return rc;
>> +}
>> +
>
>> +static int peci_ioctl_get_temp(struct peci_adapter *adapter, void *vmsg)
>> +{
>> + struct peci_get_temp_msg *umsg = vmsg;
>> + struct peci_xfer_msg msg;
>> + int rc;
>> +
>
> Is this getting the temperature?
>
Yes, this is getting the 'die' temperature of a processor package.
>> + rc = peci_cmd_support(adapter, PECI_CMD_GET_TEMP);
>> + if (rc < 0)
>> + return rc;
>> +
>> + msg.addr = umsg->addr;
>> + msg.tx_len = GET_TEMP_WR_LEN;
>> + msg.rx_len = GET_TEMP_RD_LEN;
>> + msg.tx_buf[0] = GET_TEMP_PECI_CMD;
>> +
>> + rc = peci_xfer(adapter, &msg);
>> + if (rc < 0)
>> + return rc;
>> +
>> + umsg->temp_raw = msg.rx_buf[0] | (msg.rx_buf[1] << 8);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
>
>
>> +static long peci_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int iocmd, unsigned long arg)
>> +{
>> + struct peci_adapter *adapter = file->private_data;
>> + void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
>> + unsigned int msg_len;
>> + enum peci_cmd cmd;
>> + u8 *msg;
>> + int rc = 0;
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "ioctl, cmd=0x%x, arg=0x%lx\n", iocmd, arg);
>> +
>> + switch (iocmd) {
>> + case PECI_IOC_PING:
>> + case PECI_IOC_GET_DIB:
>> + case PECI_IOC_GET_TEMP:
>> + case PECI_IOC_RD_PKG_CFG:
>> + case PECI_IOC_WR_PKG_CFG:
>> + case PECI_IOC_RD_IA_MSR:
>> + case PECI_IOC_RD_PCI_CFG:
>> + case PECI_IOC_RD_PCI_CFG_LOCAL:
>> + case PECI_IOC_WR_PCI_CFG_LOCAL:
>> + cmd = _IOC_TYPE(iocmd) - PECI_IOC_BASE;
>> + msg_len = _IOC_SIZE(iocmd);
>> + break;
>
> Adding new ioctl calls is pretty frowned up. Can you export this info
> via /sysfs?
>
Most of these are not simple IOs so ioctl is better suited, I think.
> Also, should there be some permission checks here? Or is any user
> allowed to call these ioctls?
>
I agree. I will add some permission checks here.
> Andrew
>
Thanks a lot,
Jae
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list