[PATCH v3 17/41] KVM: arm64: Remove noop calls to timer save/restore from VHE switch
Julien Grall
julien.grall at arm.com
Mon Feb 19 08:30:01 PST 2018
Hi Christoffer,
Sorry for the late reply.
On 13/02/18 22:31, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 05:53:43PM +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Christoffer,
>>
>> On 01/12/2018 12:07 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>> The VHE switch function calls __timer_enable_traps and
>>> __timer_disable_traps which don't do anything on VHE systems.
>>> Therefore, simply remove these calls from the VHE switch function and
>>> make the functions non-conditional as they are now only called from the
>>> non-VHE switch path.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall at linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 2 --
>>> virt/kvm/arm/hyp/timer-sr.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
>>> index 9aadef6966bf..6175fcb33ed2 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
>>> @@ -354,7 +354,6 @@ int kvm_vcpu_run_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> __activate_vm(vcpu->kvm);
>>> __vgic_restore_state(vcpu);
>>> - __timer_enable_traps(vcpu);
>>> /*
>>> * We must restore the 32-bit state before the sysregs, thanks
>>> @@ -373,7 +372,6 @@ int kvm_vcpu_run_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> __sysreg_save_guest_state(guest_ctxt);
>>> __sysreg32_save_state(vcpu);
>>> - __timer_disable_traps(vcpu);
>>> __vgic_save_state(vcpu);
>>> __deactivate_traps(vcpu);
>>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/timer-sr.c b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/timer-sr.c
>>> index f24404b3c8df..77754a62eb0c 100644
>>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/timer-sr.c
>>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/timer-sr.c
>>> @@ -27,34 +27,34 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_timer_set_cntvoff(u32 cntvoff_low, u32 cntvoff_high)
>>> write_sysreg(cntvoff, cntvoff_el2);
>>> }
>>> +/*
>>> + * Should only be called on non-VHE systems.
>>> + * VHE systems use EL2 timers and configure EL1 timers in kvm_timer_init_vhe().
>>> + */
>>> void __hyp_text __timer_disable_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>
>> Would it be worth to suffix the function with nvhe? So it would be clear
>> that it should not be called for VHE system?
>>
> Actually, I decided against this, because it's also called from the
> 32-bit code and it looks a little strange there, and it's not like we
> have an equivalent _vhe version.
The main goal was to provide a naming that would prevent someone to use
it in VHE case. This would have also been inline with other patches
where you rename some helpers to nvhe/vhe even in arm32 code.
Anyway, I guess the reviewers will be careful enough to spot that :).
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list