[PATCH v4 0/6] 32bit ARM branch predictor hardening

Marc Zyngier marc.zyngier at arm.com
Mon Feb 5 02:22:34 PST 2018


On 05/02/18 10:01, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 11:07:32AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> This small series implements some basic BP hardening by invalidating
>> the BTB on 32bit ARM CPUs that are known to be susceptible to aliasing
>> attacks (Spectre variant 2). It doesn't help non-ARM 32bit CPUs, nor
>> 32bit kernels that run on 64bit capable CPUs. This series doesn't
>> mitigate Spectre variant 1 either.
>>
>> These patches are closely modelled against what we do on arm64,
>> although simpler as we can rely on an architected instruction to
>> perform the invalidation. The notable exception is Cortex-A15, where
>> BTB invalidation behaves like a NOP, and the only way to shoot the
>> predictor down is to invalidate the icache *and* to have ACTLR[0] set
>> to 1 (which is a secure-only operation).
>>
>> The first patch reuses the Cortex-A8 BTB invalidation in switch_mm and
>> generalises it to be used on all affected CPUs. The second perform the
>> same invalidation on prefetch abort outside of the userspace
>> range. The third one nukes it on guest exit, and results in some major
>> surgery as we cannot take a branch from the vectors (that, and Thumb2
>> being a massive pain).
>>
>> Patches 4 to 6 are doing a similar thing for Cortex-A15, with the
>> aforementioned ICIALLU.
>>
>> To sum up the requirements:
>>
>> - Cortex-A15 need to have ACTLR.IBE (bit 0) set to 1 from secure
>>   mode. Cortex-A8 also needs to have ACTLR.IBE (bit 6) set, overlaping
>>   with ARM_ERRATA_430973 which also requires it.
>> - Cortex-A9, A12 and A17 do not require any extra configuration.
>>
>> Note 1: Contrary to the initial version, this new series relies on
>> the arm64/kpti branch (I reuse the per-CPU vector hook for KVM).
>>
>> Note 2: M-class CPUs are not affected and for R-class cores, the
>> mitigation doesn't make much sense since we do not enforce user/kernel
>> isolation.
>>
>> [Christoffer: since the patches have significantly changed since v3,
>> I've dropped your RB tags]
> 
> Except for the question on patch 4, you can add my tag back to the
> series.
> 
> I particularly enjoyed the cute xor hack in patch 3.

I feel that I've written too much of that kind of hacks lately...

> Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall at linaro.org>

Thanks!

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list