[PATCH RESEND] ARM: dts: imx6ul: add missing OSC32K_32K_OUT mux mode

Shawn Guo shawnguo at kernel.org
Sun Feb 4 21:38:04 PST 2018


On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:27:45AM +0100, Jörg Krause wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
> 
> On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 09:50 +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 09:25 +0100, Jörg Krause wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 00:23 +0100, Jörg Krause wrote:
> > > > RESEND because of missing Ccs. Original patch is [0].
> > > > 
> > > > The 32 kHz reference clock on the i.MX6UL(L) can be output by
> > > > setting the external signal XTALOSC_REF_CLK_32K in one of the
> > > > following ways [1]:
> > > > 
> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------|
> > > > > Signal              | Pad             | Mode | Direction |
> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------|
> > > > > XTALOSC_REF_CLK_32K | ENET1_RX_EN     | ALT2 | O         |
> > > > >                     | GPIO1_IO03      | ALT3 |           |
> > > > >                     | JTAG_TCK        | ALT6 |           |
> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------|
> > > > 
> > > > [0] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/816108/
> > > > [1] IMX6ULRM, Rev. 1, 04/2016, Table 58-1
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jörg Krause <joerg.krause at embedded.rocks>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-pinfunc.h | 3 +++
> > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-pinfunc.h b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-pinfunc.h
> > > > index 0034eeb84542..e12654018c23 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-pinfunc.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-pinfunc.h
> > > > @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
> > > >  #define MX6UL_PAD_JTAG_TCK__SAI2_RX_DATA		0x0054 0x02e0 0x05f4 2 0
> > > >  #define MX6UL_PAD_JTAG_TCK__PWM7_OUT			0x0054 0x02e0 0x0000 4 0
> > > >  #define MX6UL_PAD_JTAG_TCK__GPIO1_IO14			0x0054 0x02e0 0x0000 5 0
> > > > +#define MX6UL_PAD_JTAG_TCK__OSC32K_32K_OUT		0x0054 0x02e0 0x0000 6 0
> > > >  #define MX6UL_PAD_JTAG_TCK__SIM2_POWER_FAIL		0x0054 0x02e0 0x0000 8 0
> > > >  #define MX6UL_PAD_JTAG_TRST_B__SJC_TRSTB		0x0058 0x02e4 0x0000 0 0
> > > >  #define MX6UL_PAD_JTAG_TRST_B__GPT2_COMPARE3		0x0058 0x02e4 0x0000 1 0
> > > > @@ -101,6 +102,7 @@
> > > >  #define MX6UL_PAD_GPIO1_IO03__I2C1_SDA			0x0068 0x02f4 0x05a8 0 1
> > > >  #define MX6UL_PAD_GPIO1_IO03__GPT1_COMPARE3		0x0068 0x02f4 0x0000 1 0
> > > >  #define MX6UL_PAD_GPIO1_IO03__USB_OTG2_OC		0x0068 0x02f4 0x0660 2 0
> > > > +#define MX6UL_PAD_GPIO1_IO03__OSC32K_32K_OUT		0x0068 0x02f4 0x0000 3 0
> > > >  #define MX6UL_PAD_GPIO1_IO03__USDHC1_CD_B		0x0068 0x02f4 0x0668 4 0
> > > >  #define MX6UL_PAD_GPIO1_IO03__GPIO1_IO03		0x0068 0x02f4 0x0000 5 0
> > > >  #define MX6UL_PAD_GPIO1_IO03__CCM_DI0_eXT_CLK		0x0068 0x02f4 0x0000 6 0
> > > > @@ -316,6 +318,7 @@
> > > >  #define MX6UL_PAD_ENET1_RX_EN__ENET1_RX_EN		0x00cc 0x0358 0x0000 0 0
> > > >  #define MX6UL_PAD_ENET1_RX_EN__UART5_DCE_RTS		0x00cc 0x0358 0x0640 1 3
> > > >  #define MX6UL_PAD_ENET1_RX_EN__UART5_DTE_CTS		0x00cc 0x0358 0x0000 1 0
> > > > +#define MX6UL_PAD_ENET1_RX_EN__OSC32K_32K_OUT		0x00cc 0x0358 0x0000 2 0
> > > >  #define MX6UL_PAD_ENET1_RX_EN__CSI_DATA18		0x00cc 0x0358 0x0000 3 0
> > > >  #define MX6UL_PAD_ENET1_RX_EN__FLEXCAN2_TX		0x00cc 0x0358 0x0000 4 0
> > > >  #define MX6UL_PAD_ENET1_RX_EN__GPIO2_IO02		0x00cc 0x0358 0x0000 5 0
> > > 
> > > Just noticed the pin is named REF_CLK_32K instead of OSC32K_32K_OUT in
> > > the vendor Linux kernel. So better use their pin naming, right?
> > 
> > The i.MX 6UltraLite Applications Processor Reference Manual, Rev. 1
> > (Chapters 30.5.17, SW_MUX_CTL_PAD_JTAG_TCK SW MUX Control Register, and
> > 30.5.47, SW_MUX_CTL_PAD_ENET1_RX_EN SW MUX Control Register) calls this
> > OSC32K_32K_OUT.
> 
> Thanks for the reference! I guess this is why I named it this way in
> the first place.

I tried to apply the patch and found that I had already applied one from
Fugang and Stefan [1].  That patch adds the OSC32K_32K_OUT mux mode in name
of REF_CLK_32K.

I agree OSC32K_32K_OUT from Reference Manual should be used instead.
Can you please resend your patch by rebasing it on imx/dt branch?
Thanks.

Shawn

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10156121/



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list