[Patch v8 11/12] [media] s5p-mfc: Add support for HEVC encoder
Hans Verkuil
hverkuil at xs4all.nl
Fri Feb 2 06:09:19 PST 2018
On 02/02/18 13:25, Smitha T Murthy wrote:
> Add HEVC encoder support and necessary registers, V4L2 CIDs,
> and hevc encoder parameters
>
> Signed-off-by: Smitha T Murthy <smitha.t at samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil at cisco.com>
Not quite, one last comment:
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/regs-mfc-v10.h | 28 +-
> drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c | 1 +
> drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_cmd_v6.c | 3 +
> drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_common.h | 54 ++-
> drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_enc.c | 536 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr.h | 8 +
> drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.c | 182 ++++++++
> drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.h | 8 +
> 8 files changed, 818 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
<snip>
> static inline int vui_sar_idc(enum v4l2_mpeg_video_h264_vui_sar_idc sar)
> {
> static unsigned int t[V4L2_MPEG_VIDEO_H264_VUI_SAR_IDC_EXTENDED + 1] = {
> @@ -1635,6 +2024,153 @@ static int s5p_mfc_enc_s_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
> case V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_VPX_PROFILE:
> p->codec.vp8.profile = ctrl->val;
> break;
> + case V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_HEVC_I_FRAME_QP:
> + p->codec.hevc.rc_frame_qp = ctrl->val;
> + break;
> + case V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_HEVC_P_FRAME_QP:
> + p->codec.hevc.rc_p_frame_qp = ctrl->val;
> + break;
> + case V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_HEVC_B_FRAME_QP:
> + p->codec.hevc.rc_b_frame_qp = ctrl->val;
> + break;
> + case V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_HEVC_FRAME_RATE_RESOLUTION:
> + p->codec.hevc.rc_framerate = ctrl->val;
> + break;
> + case V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_HEVC_MIN_QP:
> + p->codec.hevc.rc_min_qp = ctrl->val;
> + break;
> + case V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_HEVC_MAX_QP:
> + p->codec.hevc.rc_max_qp = ctrl->val;
> + break;
When you change this, you should call __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range to modify the
range of the controls that depend on this.
You can make a patch '13/12' for this or post a v9 for this patch. I would like to
see this implemented. It's one of those things that never gets implemented if you
don't address this now.
It shouldn't be difficult to do.
Regards,
Hans
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list