[PATCH v2 08/17] kvm: arm/arm64: Prepare for VM specific stage2 translations
Julien Grall
julien.grall at arm.com
Thu Apr 26 06:35:10 PDT 2018
Hi Suzuki,
On 27/03/18 14:15, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Right now the stage2 page table for a VM is hard coded, assuming
> an IPA of 40bits. As we are about to add support for per VM IPA,
> prepare the stage2 page table helpers to accept the kvm instance
> to make the right decision for the VM. No functional changes.
>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> Cc: Christoffer Dall <cdall at kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose at arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h | 3 +-
> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h | 15 +++-
> arch/arm/include/asm/stage2_pgtable.h | 42 ++++-----
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h | 7 +-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/stage2_pgtable-nopmd.h | 18 ++--
> arch/arm64/include/asm/stage2_pgtable-nopud.h | 16 ++--
> arch/arm64/include/asm/stage2_pgtable.h | 49 ++++++-----
> virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 2 +-
> virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c | 119 +++++++++++++-------------
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c | 2 +-
> 10 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> index 3ab8b37..c3f1f9b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> @@ -133,8 +133,7 @@
> * space.
> */
> #define KVM_PHYS_SHIFT (40)
> -#define KVM_PHYS_SIZE (_AC(1, ULL) << KVM_PHYS_SHIFT)
> -#define KVM_PHYS_MASK (KVM_PHYS_SIZE - _AC(1, ULL))
I assume you are moving them to kvm_mmu.h in order to match the arm64
side, right? If so, would not it make sense to make KVM_PHYS_SHIFT with it?
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> index 7faed6e..594c4e6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> @@ -134,8 +134,11 @@ static inline unsigned long __kern_hyp_va(unsigned long v)
> * We currently only support a 40bit IPA.
> */
> #define KVM_PHYS_SHIFT (40)
> -#define KVM_PHYS_SIZE (1UL << KVM_PHYS_SHIFT)
> -#define KVM_PHYS_MASK (KVM_PHYS_SIZE - 1UL)
> +
> +#define kvm_phys_shift(kvm) KVM_PHYS_SHIFT
> +#define kvm_phys_size(kvm) (_AC(1, ULL) << kvm_phys_shift(kvm))
NIT: is the _AC(...) necessary? It does not look like this function is
going to be usable in assembly.
> +#define kvm_phys_mask(kvm) (kvm_phys_size(kvm) - _AC(1, ULL))
Same here.
--
Julien Grall
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list