[PATCH v3 7/7] drm/i2c: tda998x: register as a drm bridge

Peter Rosin peda at axentia.se
Fri Apr 20 06:09:51 PDT 2018


On 2018-04-20 12:53, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:49:42PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2018-04-20 12:41, kbuild test robot wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>>
>> Yup, right you are!
>>
>>> [auto build test ERROR on drm/drm-next]
>>> [also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc1 next-20180420]
>>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
>>>
>>> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Peter-Rosin/Add-tda998x-HDMI-support-to-atmel-hlcdc/20180420-160131
>>> base:   git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux.git drm-next
>>> config: i386-randconfig-a0-201815 (attached as .config)
>>> compiler: gcc-4.9 (Debian 4.9.4-2) 4.9.4
>>> reproduce:
>>>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>>         make ARCH=i386 
>>>
>>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>>
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c: In function 'tda998x_probe':
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c:1859:16: error: 'struct drm_bridge' has no member named 'of_node'
>>>      bridge->bridge.of_node = dev->of_node;
>>>                    ^
>>
>> Anybody got a better fix than this?
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> 	bridge->bridge.of_node = dev->of_node;
>> #endif
> 
> How about the bridge code provides a helper to do this, something like:
> 
> static inline void bridge_set_device(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> 				     struct device *dev)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> 	bridge->of_node = dev->of_node;
> #endif
> }
> 
> which (a) nicely hides the firmware flavour, and (b) hides the ifdef in
> the bridge header where it belongs.  If the bridge code needs to be
> converted to fwnode in the future, at least this would be abstracted
> from the drivers.
> 

Hmm, I looked around and found numerous other #ifdefs for this, so my plan
is to just add one more. Fixing up all these ifdefs is orthogonal and can
be done later.

Cheers,
Peter

PS. I also noted that I had forgotten to remove a couple of dev_info calls
in this patch. Will remove for v4.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list