[PATCH v2 1/2] irqchip: stm32: Optimizes and cleans up stm32-exti irq_domain

[Ludovic BARRE]

Hi Radoslaw

I preparing a patch serie which add support of stm32mp1.
Would you like, I add your patch (with commit message updated)
in my serie?
patch:
-irqchip: stm32: Optimizes and cleans up stm32-exti irq_domain

BR
Ludo

On 03/14/2018 01:04 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 14/03/18 11:46, Radosław Pietrzyk wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>> We had a quite fruitful discussion in this mail thread regarding this
>> topic and Ludovic acked it so recently I have asked Thomas if he still
>> needs this v3 patch with detailed explanation especially as v2 version
>> of stm32-gpio patch has been already taken by Linus. However if you
>> require I can resend v3 of this patch only with this detailed explanation.
> 
> That'd be useful. The changelog is the only thing that will be left from
> this discussion, so it'd better be complete and accurate. If you quickly
> send a v3 for this single patch, I'll queue it right away.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	M.
> 
>>
>> 2018-03-14 12:09 GMT+01:00 Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com
>> <mailto:marc.zyngier at arm.com>>:
>>
>>      Radoslaw,
>>
>>      On 23/02/18 08:42, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>      > Radoslaw,
>>      >
>>      > On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Radoslaw Pietrzyk wrote:
>>      >
>>      >> - discards setting handle_simple_irq handler for hierarchy interrupts
>>      >> - removes acking in chained irq handler as this is done by
>>      >> irq_chip itself inside handle_edge_irq
>>      >> - removes unneeded irq_domain_ops.xlate callback
>>      >
>>      > if that's all functionally correct, then this is a nice cleanup. Though
>>      > from the above changelog its hard to tell because it merily tells WHAT the
>>      > patch does, but not WHY. The WHY is the important information for a
>>      > reviewer who is not familiar with the particular piece of code/hardware.
>>      >
>>      > Can you please amend the changelog with proper explanations why a
>>      > particular piece of code is not needed or has to be changed to something
>>      > else?
>>
>>      Any update on this? I'd like to queue this for 4.17, but Thomas'
>>      comments should be addressed before that happens. Ca you please respin a
>>      version with a better change log and the various review tags?
>>
>>      Thanks,
>>
>>              M.
>>      --
>>      Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
>>
>>
> 
>