[PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3: Support v2m frame backwards compatibility mode
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Tue Apr 10 10:30:45 PDT 2018
On 10/04/18 16:23, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> I have a vague idea how to support this. Given that level-triggered MSIs
> have to be platform MSIs (because it is just madness otherwise), we can
> probably store an extra message in the struct platform_msi_desc for the
> "lower the line" write. On activation, you'd get two callbacks, probably
> with a flag of some sort to indicate whether this is for the rising or
> falling edge.
Actually, we can get away with a single call and no extra storage if we do
something like below, and check the trigger in the backends:
diff --git a/kernel/irq/msi.c b/kernel/irq/msi.c
index 2a8571f72b17..85408be6d752 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/msi.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/msi.c
@@ -89,13 +89,13 @@ int msi_domain_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data,
const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
{
struct irq_data *parent = irq_data->parent_data;
- struct msi_msg msg;
+ struct msi_msg msg[2];
int ret;
ret = parent->chip->irq_set_affinity(parent, mask, force);
if (ret >= 0 && ret != IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE) {
- BUG_ON(irq_chip_compose_msi_msg(irq_data, &msg));
- irq_chip_write_msi_msg(irq_data, &msg);
+ BUG_ON(irq_chip_compose_msi_msg(irq_data, msg));
+ irq_chip_write_msi_msg(irq_data, msg);
}
return ret;
@@ -104,20 +104,20 @@ int msi_domain_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data,
static int msi_domain_activate(struct irq_domain *domain,
struct irq_data *irq_data, bool early)
{
- struct msi_msg msg;
+ struct msi_msg msg[2];
- BUG_ON(irq_chip_compose_msi_msg(irq_data, &msg));
- irq_chip_write_msi_msg(irq_data, &msg);
+ BUG_ON(irq_chip_compose_msi_msg(irq_data, msg));
+ irq_chip_write_msi_msg(irq_data, msg);
return 0;
}
static void msi_domain_deactivate(struct irq_domain *domain,
struct irq_data *irq_data)
{
- struct msi_msg msg;
+ struct msi_msg msg[2];
- memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
- irq_chip_write_msi_msg(irq_data, &msg);
+ memset(msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
+ irq_chip_write_msi_msg(irq_data, msg);
}
static int msi_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
Is it disgusting? You bet. Does it work? Probably.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list