[PATCH v2 3/6] i2c: i2c-stm32f7: Add initial SMBus protocols support

[Wolfram Sang]

> >> All SMBus protocols are implemented except SMBus-specific protocols.
> > 
> > What does that mean?
> 
> It miss SMBus Host Notification and SMBBus Alert. They are almost ready but I'm
> struggling to put them back to operational state after recent changes related to
> SMBust Host Notification. A more "classic" interrupt base solution has been put
> in place but I fail to use implement it in my side.
> Another patch set is going to be delivered for these 2 commands.

This is totally fine to implement it incrementally. Please just update the
commit message with the more detailed explanation above.

> > That is quite some complexity considering we have I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL. I
> > don't mind, but you really want that?
> > 
> 
> All SMBBus commands are implemented as such. I never try to emulation commands.
> Should we use emulation SMBus commands or real commands... Don't know.

You won't see any difference on the wire. I don't know your HW. It might
be that SMBus mode is more "automatic" and uses less interrupts. Or
stuff like Alert or HostNotification only works in this mode. If you and
the driver maintainers think it is worth the added complexity, I am
fine, too.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180403/1fed5f2c/attachment.sig>