[PATCH v3 2/2] drivers: soc: Add LLCC driver
Channa
ckadabi at codeaurora.org
Mon Apr 2 12:03:04 PDT 2018
On 2018-04-02 02:11, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please adjust your mail client to drop on new line on 80 column!
>
> On 03/29/2018 08:55 PM, Channa wrote:
>> On 2018-03-29 01:08, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 03/27/2018 09:52 PM, Rishabh Bhatnagar wrote:
>>>> LLCC (Last Level Cache Controller) provides additional cache memory
>>>> in the system. LLCC is partitioned into muliple slices and each
>>>> slice getting its own priority, size, ID and other config
>>>> parameters.
>>>> LLCC driver programs these parameters for each slice. Clients that
>>>> are assigned to use LLCC need to get information such size & ID of
>>>> the
>>>> slice they get and activate or deactivate the slice as needed. LLCC
>>>> driver
>>>> provides API interfaces for the clients to perform these operations.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Channagoud Kadabi <ckadabi at codeaurora.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb at codeaurora.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig | 16 ++
>>>> drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile | 2 +
>>>> drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-sdm845.c | 120 ++++++++++
>>>> drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-slice.c | 454
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>> I'd name it just llcc.c, slice suffix didn't add any value.
>>>
>>>> include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h | 178 +++++++++++++++
>>>> 5 files changed, 770 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-sdm845.c
>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-slice.c
>>>> create mode 100644 include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
>>>> index e050eb8..28237fc 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -21,6 +21,22 @@ config QCOM_GSBI
>>>> functions for connecting the underlying serial UART, SPI,
>>>> and I2C
>>>> devices to the output pins.
>>>>
>>>> +config QCOM_LLCC
>>>> + tristate "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. LLCC driver"
>>>> + depends on ARCH_QCOM
>>>> + help
>>>> + Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. platform specific LLCC driver for
>>>> Last
>>>> + Level Cache. This provides interfaces to client's that use
>>>> the
>>>> LLCC.
>>>> + Say yes here to enable LLCC slice driver.
>>>> +
>>>> +config QCOM_SDM845_LLCC
>>>> + tristate "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SDM845 LLCC driver"
>>>> + depends on QCOM_LLCC
>>>> + help
>>>> + Say yes here to enable the LLCC driver for SDM845. This is
>>>> provides
>>>> + data required to configure LLCC so that clients can start
>>>> using the
>>>> + LLCC slices.
>>>> +
>>>> config QCOM_MDT_LOADER
>>>> tristate
>>>> select QCOM_SCM
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile b/drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile
>>>> index dcebf28..e16d6a2 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile
>>>> @@ -12,3 +12,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_SMEM_STATE) += smem_state.o
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_SMP2P) += smp2p.o
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_SMSM) += smsm.o
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_WCNSS_CTRL) += wcnss_ctrl.o
>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_LLCC) += llcc-slice.o
>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_SDM845_LLCC) += llcc-sdm845.o
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-sdm845.c
>>>> b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-sdm845.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..cd431d9
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-sdm845.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
>>>> +/* Copyright (c) 2017-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights
>>>> reserved.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>>>> modify
>>>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2
>>>> and
>>>> + * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>>>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>>>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>>>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * SCT entry contains of the following parameters
>>>> + * name: Name of the client's use case for which the llcc slice is
>>>> used
>>>> + * uid: Unique id for the client's use case
>>>> + * slice_id: llcc slice id for each client
>>>> + * max_cap: The maximum capacity of the cache slice provided in KB
>>>> + * priority: Priority of the client used to select victim line for
>>>> replacement
>>>> + * fixed_size: Determine of the slice has a fixed capacity
>>>> + * bonus_ways: Bonus ways to be used by any slice, bonus way is
>>>> used
>>>> only if
>>>> + * it't not a reserved way.
>>>> + * res_ways: Reserved ways for the cache slice, the reserved ways
>>>> cannot be used
>>>> + * by any other client than the one its assigned to.
>>>> + * cache_mode: Each slice operates as a cache, this controls the
>>>> mode of the
>>>> + * slice normal or TCM
>>>> + * probe_target_ways: Determines what ways to probe for access hit.
>>>> When
>>>> + * configured to 1 only bonus and reseved ways
>>>> are probed.
>>>> + * when configured to 0 all ways in llcc are
>>>> probed.
>>>> + * dis_cap_alloc: Disable capacity based allocation for a client
>>>> + * retain_on_pc: If this bit is set and client has maitained active
>>>> vote
>>>> + * then the ways assigned to this client are not
>>>> flushed on power
>>>> + * collapse.
>>>> + * activate_on_init: Activate the slice immidiately after the SCT
>>>> is
>>>> programmed
>>>> + */
>>>> +#define SCT_ENTRY(n, uid, sid, mc, p, fs, bway, rway, cmod, ptw,
>>>> dca, rp, a) \
>>>> + { \
>>>> + .name = n, \
>>>> + .usecase_id = uid, \
>>>> + .slice_id = sid, \
>>>> + .max_cap = mc, \
>>>> + .priority = p, \
>>>> + .fixed_size = fs, \
>>>> + .bonus_ways = bway, \
>>>> + .res_ways = rway, \
>>>> + .cache_mode = cmod, \
>>>> + .probe_target_ways = ptw, \
>>>> + .dis_cap_alloc = dca, \
>>>> + .retain_on_pc = rp, \
>>>> + .activate_on_init = a, \
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct llcc_slice_config sdm845_data[] = {
>>>> + SCT_ENTRY("cpuss", 1, 1, 2816, 1, 0, 0xFFC, 0x2, 0, 0, 1,
>>>> 1, 1),
>>>> + SCT_ENTRY("vidsc0", 2, 2, 512, 2, 1, 0x0, 0x0F0, 0, 0, 1,
>>>> 1, 0),
>>>> + SCT_ENTRY("vidsc1", 3, 3, 512, 2, 1, 0x0, 0x0F0, 0, 0, 1,
>>>> 1, 0),
>>>> + SCT_ENTRY("rotator", 4, 4, 563, 2, 1, 0x0, 0x00e, 2, 0, 1,
>>>> 1, 0),
>>>> + SCT_ENTRY("voice", 5, 5, 2816, 1, 0, 0xFFC, 0x2, 0, 0, 1,
>>>> 1, 0),
>>>> + SCT_ENTRY("audio", 6, 6, 2816, 1, 0, 0xFFC, 0x2, 0, 0, 1,
>>>> 1, 0),
>>>> + SCT_ENTRY("modemhp_grow", 7, 7, 1024, 2, 0, 0x0FC, 0xF00, 0, 0,
>>>> 1, 1, 0),
>>>> + SCT_ENTRY("modem", 8, 8, 2816, 1, 0, 0xFFC, 0x2, 0, 0, 1,
>>>> 1, 0),
>>>> + SCT_ENTRY("compute", 10, 10, 2816, 1, 0, 0xFFC, 0x2, 0, 0,
>>>> 1, 1, 0),
>>>> + SCT_ENTRY("gpuhtw", 11, 11, 512, 1, 1, 0xC, 0x0, 0, 0, 1,
>>>> 1, 0),
>>>> + SCT_ENTRY("gpu", 12, 12, 2304, 1, 0, 0xFF0, 0x2, 0, 0,
>>>> 1, 1, 0),
>>>> + SCT_ENTRY("mmuhwt", 13, 13, 256, 2, 0, 0x0, 0x1, 0, 0, 1,
>>>> 0, 1),
>>>> + SCT_ENTRY("compute_dma", 15, 15, 2816, 1, 0, 0xFFC, 0x2, 0, 0,
>>>> 1, 1, 0),
>>>> + SCT_ENTRY("display", 16, 16, 2816, 1, 0, 0xFFC, 0x2, 0, 0,
>>>> 1, 1, 0),
>>>> + SCT_ENTRY("videofw", 17, 17, 2816, 1, 0, 0xFFC, 0x2, 0, 0,
>>>> 1, 1, 0),
>>>> + SCT_ENTRY("modemhp_fix", 20, 20, 1024, 2, 1, 0x0, 0xF00, 0, 0,
>>>> 1, 1, 0),
>>>> + SCT_ENTRY("modem_paging", 21, 21, 1024, 0, 1, 0x1e, 0x0, 0, 0,
>>>> 1, 1, 0),
>>>> + SCT_ENTRY("audiohw", 22, 22, 1024, 1, 1, 0xFFC, 0x2, 0, 0,
>>>> 1, 1, 0),
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +
>>>> +static int sdm845_qcom_llcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return qcom_llcc_probe(pdev, sdm845_data,
>>>> ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_data));
>>>
>>> I think having separate driver just for this config structure is
>>> pointless. Please move this in llcc driver and select the
>>> configuration
>>> based on compatible string.
>>
>> Thanks Stan for your review.
>>
>> Wanted to highlight the reason we chose this approach. The System
>> cache
>> table data
>> changes from chipset to chipset and overtime the table could have more
>> parameters.
>> Adding it as part of the core driver and selecting the table based on
>> compatible
>> would clutter the core driver. If we have 4 chipsets supporting system
>> cache then
>> core driver would have 4 tables as above and we select one of them
>> based
>> on compatible
>> string. That is why we followed the pin control approach to have data
>> in
>> per chipset
>> driver and pass it to common driver.
>
> OK, do you plan to extend this with some more code?
Not this particular file, this is chipset specific file. We don't expect
more changes to this file.
A new driver is added for every chipset, so the data maintained here
could
change in future. So the idea is to keep the chipset driver separate
from core driver.
--
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list