[PATCH v3 5/5] mtd: spi-nor: cadence-quadspi: Add runtime PM support

Vignesh R vigneshr at ti.com
Sun Sep 24 06:08:23 PDT 2017



On 9/24/2017 5:31 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 09/24/2017 12:59 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
>> Add pm_runtime* calls to cadence-quadspi driver. This is required to
>> switch on QSPI power domain on TI 66AK2G SoC during probe.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr at ti.com>
> 
> Are you planning to add some more fine-grained PM control later?

Yes, I will need to add fine-grained PM control at some point. But, for
now SoC does not really support low power mode or runtime power saving
option.
The fact that driver still uses clk_prepare_*() calls to enable/disable
clocks instead of pm_*() calls makes it a bit tricky though.

Just figured out I forgot to add cleanup code in error handling path of
probe(). Will fix that and send a v4.

> 
>> ---
>>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c
>> index d9629e8f4798..2c8e6226d267 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c
>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
>>  #include <linux/of.h>
>>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>  #include <linux/sched.h>
>>  #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
>>  #include <linux/timer.h>
>> @@ -1224,6 +1225,13 @@ static int cqspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  		return -ENXIO;
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>> +	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
>> +	if (ret < 0) {
>> +		pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	ret = clk_prepare_enable(cqspi->clk);
>>  	if (ret) {
>>  		dev_err(dev, "Cannot enable QSPI clock.\n");
>> @@ -1275,6 +1283,9 @@ static int cqspi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  
>>  	clk_disable_unprepare(cqspi->clk);
>>  
>> +	pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
>> +	pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>> +
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>>
> 
> 



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list