[PATCH v2 06/10] arm64: allwinner: a64: Add devicetree binding for DMA controller
Stefan Bruens
stefan.bruens at rwth-aachen.de
Sat Sep 23 16:34:58 PDT 2017
On Mittwoch, 20. September 2017 22:53:00 CEST Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 05:19:52AM +0200, Stefan Brüns wrote:
> > The A64 is register compatible with the H3, but has a different number
> > of dma channels and request ports.
> >
> > Attach additional properties to the node to allow future reuse of the
> > compatible for controllers with different number of channels/requests.
> >
> > If dma-requests is not specified, the register layout defined maximum
> > of 32 is used.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens at rwth-aachen.de>
> > ---
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/dma/sun6i-dma.txt | 26
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sun6i-dma.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sun6i-dma.txt index
> > 98fbe1a5c6dd..6ebc79f95202 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sun6i-dma.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sun6i-dma.txt
> >
> > @@ -27,6 +27,32 @@ Example:
> > #dma-cells = <1>;
> >
> > };
> >
> > +-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----- +For A64 DMA controller:
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible: "allwinner,sun50i-a64-dma"
> > +- dma-channels: Number of DMA channels supported by the controller.
> > + Refer to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt
> > +- all properties above, i.e. reg, interrupts, clocks, resets and
> > #dma-cells +
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- dma-requests: Number of DMA request signals supported by the
> > controller.
> > + Refer to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt
> > +
> > +Example:
> > + dma: dma-controller at 01c02000 {
>
> Drop the leading 0. Building dtbs with W=2 will tell you this.
>
> With that,
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
The leading 0 was copied from the A31 example just a few lines above. Should I
also correct that one, or should that go in a separate patch?
Kind regards,
Stefan
--
Stefan Brüns / Bergstraße 21 / 52062 Aachen
home: +49 241 53809034 mobile: +49 151 50412019
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list