[PATCH v2 1/2] arm_arch_timer: Expose event stream status
Will Deacon
will.deacon at arm.com
Fri Sep 22 03:25:20 PDT 2017
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:39:19AM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
> The arch timer configuration for a CPU might get reset after suspending said
> CPU.
>
> In order to reliably use the event stream in the kernel (e.g. for delays),
> we keep track of the state where we can safely concider the event stream as
> properly configured.
>
> Signed-off: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry at arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> Cc: Russell King <linux at armlinux.org.uk>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch_timer.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h | 1 +
> drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h | 6 ++++++
> 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_timer.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> index d4ebf56..0b6e104 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ static inline u32 arch_timer_get_cntkctl(void)
> static inline void arch_timer_set_cntkctl(u32 cntkctl)
> {
> asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c14, c1, 0" : : "r" (cntkctl));
> + isb();
> }
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> index 74d08e4..26b3376 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ static inline u32 arch_timer_get_cntkctl(void)
> static inline void arch_timer_set_cntkctl(u32 cntkctl)
> {
> write_sysreg(cntkctl, cntkctl_el1);
> + isb();
> }
>
> static inline u64 arch_counter_get_cntpct(void)
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index aae87c4..866bbf8 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ struct arch_timer {
> static bool arch_counter_suspend_stop;
> static bool vdso_default = true;
>
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, evtstrm_available) = false;
> static bool evtstrm_enable = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_ARCH_TIMER_EVTSTREAM);
>
> static int __init early_evtstrm_cfg(char *buf)
> @@ -736,6 +737,7 @@ static void arch_timer_evtstrm_enable(int divider)
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> compat_elf_hwcap |= COMPAT_HWCAP_EVTSTRM;
> #endif
> + __this_cpu_write(evtstrm_available, true);
> }
>
> static void arch_timer_configure_evtstream(void)
> @@ -860,6 +862,26 @@ u32 arch_timer_get_rate(void)
> return arch_timer_rate;
> }
>
> +bool arch_timer_evtstrm_available(void)
> +{
> + /*
> + * This function might get called outside of a preempt disable context.
> + * This is not an issue because the result of this function will stay
> + * valid for the CPU the caller task will be running on, even if
> + * preempted. The possible case are as follow:
> + * - evtstrm_available == false -> either event stream is disabled
> + * system-wide or event stream is momentarily disabled on this CPU
> + * meaning we won't be scheduling in/out tasks on this CPU until it
> + * is reconfigured. Current task is made aware it cannot rely on
> + * event stream.
> + * - evtstrm_available == true -> task was running on a CPU with event
> + * stream enabled, if it gets preempted, it will be resumed on a CPU
> + * where event stream is configured properly. The task can use the
> + * event stream.
> + */
> + return this_cpu_read(evtstrm_available);
I think this means that a per-cpu variable isn't necessarily what we need
here. It would be clearer to me if we maintained a cpumask instead, with an
enable bit for each CPU. If the thing is disabled system-wide, then it's all
zeroes, otherwise CPUs zero their entry for the cases where the stream is
momentarily disabled during PM transitions.
The alternative would be to move the arch-timer save/restore into sleep.S
and then just check that the current CPU is online.
Will
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list