[PATCH 0/2] [v5] pinctrl: qcom: add support for sparse GPIOs
timur at codeaurora.org
Thu Sep 21 05:12:29 PDT 2017
On 9/21/17 7:08 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> I guess gpio_valid_mask would take precedence over irq_valid_mask.
> I.e if the GPIO is not valid then the IRQ is per definition not valid either.
> Since it is a new thing, we can simply define a semantic like that
> and document it.
So what about my current patches? I hope you're not asking me to
rewrite them again.
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel