[PATCH 2/2] tee: optee: allow selection of ti-smc as a calling method
robh+dt at kernel.org
Tue Sep 19 14:10:25 PDT 2017
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Andrew F. Davis <afd at ti.com> wrote:
> On 09/19/2017 08:36 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Andrew F. Davis <afd at ti.com> wrote:
>>> On TI platforms OP-TEE must be called using a modified SMC call,
>>> allow the selection of this though DT.
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd at ti.com>
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.txt | 2 ++
>>> drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 2 ++
>>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.txt
>>> index d38834c67dff..a3275ecdf186 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.txt
>>> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ the reference implementation maintained by Linaro.
>>> "hvc" : HVC #0, with the register assignments specified
>>> in drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h
>>> + "ti-smc" : Similar to "smc" with TI specific register
>>> + adjustments
>> Sigh, really? IMO, this should be determined from the compatible
>> string. Then the next TI (or any vendor) specific thing can be handled
>> without a DT change.
> Which compatible string, do you mean the OP-TEE driver check the top
> level platform compatible string?
No, you need to have something like "ti,optee-tz" for the driver to
match on because your implementation is different.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel