[PATCH 5/6] arm64: Fixup users of topology_physical_package_id
Jeremy Linton
jeremy.linton at arm.com
Thu Sep 14 11:49:10 PDT 2017
There are a few arm64 specific users (cpufreq, psci, etc) which really
want the cluster rather than the topology_physical_package_id(). Lets
convert those users to topology_cod_id(). That way when we start
differentiating the socket/cluster they will continue to behave correctly.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton at arm.com>
---
drivers/clk/clk-mb86s7x.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 2 +-
drivers/firmware/psci_checker.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-mb86s7x.c b/drivers/clk/clk-mb86s7x.c
index 2a83a3ff1d09..da4b456f9afc 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-mb86s7x.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-mb86s7x.c
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ static struct clk_hw *mb86s7x_clclk_register(struct device *cpu_dev)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
clc->hw.init = &init;
- clc->cluster = topology_physical_package_id(cpu_dev->id);
+ clc->cluster = topology_cod_id(cpu_dev->id);
init.name = dev_name(cpu_dev);
init.ops = &clk_clc_ops;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
index 17504129fd77..6ee69b3820de 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static struct mutex cluster_lock[MAX_CLUSTERS];
static inline int raw_cpu_to_cluster(int cpu)
{
- return topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
+ return topology_cod_id(cpu);
}
static inline int cpu_to_cluster(int cpu)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci_checker.c b/drivers/firmware/psci_checker.c
index 6523ce962865..a9465f5d344a 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/psci_checker.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/psci_checker.c
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static int hotplug_tests(void)
*/
for (i = 0; i < nb_cluster; ++i) {
int cluster_id =
- topology_physical_package_id(cpumask_any(clusters[i]));
+ topology_cod_id(cpumask_any(clusters[i]));
ssize_t len = cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, page_buf,
clusters[i]);
/* Remove trailing newline. */
--
2.13.5
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list