[PATCH 0/3] Tango PCIe host bridge MSI support + required API
Marc Gonzalez
marc_gonzalez at sigmadesigns.com
Wed Sep 13 00:57:47 PDT 2017
On 29/08/2017 16:19, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> Bjorn, Marc Z,
>
> This patch-set includes:
>
> o [PATCH v11] PCI: tango: Add MSI controller support
> with the doorbell address parsed from DT instead of hard-coded
> in the driver.
>
> o A wrapper to parse dma-ranges was added to drivers/of/address.c
>
> o A few drivers were converted to use the new wrapper
>
> Marc Gonzalez (3):
> of/pci: Add dma-ranges parsing support
> PCI: Use of_pci_dma_range_parser_init API
> PCI: tango: Add MSI controller support
>
> drivers/of/address.c | 19 +++-
> drivers/pci/host/pci-ftpci100.c | 20 +---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c | 20 +---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene.c | 20 +---
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c | 20 +---
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c | 20 +---
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-tango.c | 205 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/of_address.h | 10 +-
> 8 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
What's the word on this patch series?
Marc Z, Robin: is the computation of pcie->msi_doorbell alright?
(Is u64 the correct type for a PCI address?)
Should the first two patches be squashed together, in case reverting
is required?
Regards.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list