[PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: arm/arm64: Rearrange kvm_vgic_[un]map_phys code in vgic.c
Auger Eric
eric.auger at redhat.com
Tue Sep 5 03:26:14 PDT 2017
Hi Christoffer,
On 04/09/2017 12:24, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> The small indirection of a static function made the locking very obvious
> but becomes pretty ugly as we start passing function pointer around.
> Let's inline these two functions first to make the following patch more
> readable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall at linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 38 +++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> index 7aec730..b704ff5 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> @@ -435,12 +435,17 @@ int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/* @irq->irq_lock must be held */
I chose to hold the lock outside of kvm_vgic_map/unmap_irq because in
kvm_vgic_set_forwarding(see https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/6/15/278) I was
also testing hw and target_vcpu fields. As you pointed out maybe I am
not obliged to check them but that was the rationale.
Thanks
Eric
> -static int kvm_vgic_map_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_irq *irq,
> - unsigned int host_irq)
> +int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int host_irq,
> + u32 vintid)
> {
> + struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, vintid);
> struct irq_desc *desc;
> struct irq_data *data;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + BUG_ON(!irq);
> +
> + spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
>
> /*
> * Find the physical IRQ number corresponding to @host_irq
> @@ -448,7 +453,8 @@ static int kvm_vgic_map_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_irq *irq,
> desc = irq_to_desc(host_irq);
> if (!desc) {
> kvm_err("%s: no interrupt descriptor\n", __func__);
> - return -EINVAL;
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> }
> data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> while (data->parent_data)
> @@ -457,29 +463,10 @@ static int kvm_vgic_map_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_irq *irq,
> irq->hw = true;
> irq->host_irq = host_irq;
> irq->hwintid = data->hwirq;
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -/* @irq->irq_lock must be held */
> -static inline void kvm_vgic_unmap_irq(struct vgic_irq *irq)
> -{
> - irq->hw = false;
> - irq->hwintid = 0;
> -}
> -
> -int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int host_irq,
> - u32 vintid)
> -{
> - struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, vintid);
> - int ret;
>
> - BUG_ON(!irq);
> -
> - spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
> - ret = kvm_vgic_map_irq(vcpu, irq, host_irq);
> +out:
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> -
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -494,7 +481,8 @@ int kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int vintid)
> BUG_ON(!irq);
>
> spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
> - kvm_vgic_unmap_irq(irq);
> + irq->hw = false;
> + irq->hwintid = 0;
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list