[RFC PATCH 2/4] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Support level-triggered mapped interrupts

Christoffer Dall cdall at linaro.org
Sat Sep 2 13:37:53 PDT 2017


On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 11:52:57AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29 2017 at 11:39:00 am BST, Christoffer Dall <cdall at linaro.org> wrote:
> > Level-triggered mapped IRQs are special because we only observe rising
> > edges as input to the VGIC, and we don't set the EOI flag and therefore
> > are not told when the level goes down, so that we can re-queue a new
> > interrupt when the level goes up.
> >
> > One way to solve this problem is to side-step the logic of the VGIC and
> > special case the validation in the injection path, but it has the
> > unfortunate drawback of having to peak into the physical GIC state
> > whenever we want to know if the interrupt is pending on the virtual
> > distributor.
> >
> > Instead, we can maintain the current semantics of a level triggered
> > interrupt by sort of treating it as an edge-triggered interrupt,
> > following from the fact that we only observe an asserting edge.  This
> 
> Would it be worth mentioning that this is a consequence of offloading
> part of the flow handling to the HW?
> 

Possibly, but I'm not really sure what that actually means.  Can you
explain a little more, and I'll be happy to add the text?

> > requires us to be a bit careful when populating the LRs and when folding
> > the state back in though:
> >
> >  * We lower the line level when populating the LR, so that when
> >    subsequently observing an asserting edge, the VGIC will do the right
> >    thing.
> >
> >  * If the guest never acked the interrupt while running (for example if
> >    it had masked interrupts at the CPU level while running), we have
> >    to preserve the pending state of the LR and move it back to the
> >    line_level field of the struct irq when folding LR state.
> >
> >    If the guest never acked the interrupt while running, but changed the
> >    device state and lowered the line (again with interrupts masked) then
> >    we need to observe this change in the line_level.
> >
> >    Both of the above situations are solved by sampling the physical line
> >    and set the line level when folding the LR back.
> >
> >  * Finally, if the guest never acked the interrupt while running and
> >    sampling the line reveals that the device state has changed and the
> >    line has been lowered, we must clear the physical active state, since
> >    we will otherwise never be told when the interrupt becomes asserted
> >    again.
> >
> > This has the added benefit of making the timer optimization patches
> > (https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/kvmarm/2017-July/026343.html) a
> > bit simpler, because the timer code doesn't have to clear the active
> > state on the sync anymore.  It also potentially improves the performance
> > of the timer implementation because the GIC knows the state or the LR
> > and only needs to clear the
> > active state when the pending bit in the LR is still set, where the
> > timer has to always clear it when returning from running the guest with
> > an injected timer interrupt.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall at linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c    | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h    |  7 +++++++
> >  4 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
> > index e4187e5..f7c5cb5 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
> > @@ -104,6 +104,26 @@ void vgic_v2_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  				irq->pending_latch = false;
> >  		}
> >  
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Level-triggered mapped IRQs are special because we only
> > +		 * observe rising edges as input to the VGIC.
> > +		 *
> > +		 * If the guest never acked the interrupt we have to sample
> > +		 * the physical line and set the line level, because the
> > +		 * device state could have changed or we simply need to
> > +		 * process the still pending interrupt later.
> > +		 *
> > +		 * If this causes us to lower the level, we have to also clear
> > +		 * the physical active state, since we will otherwise never be
> > +		 * told when the interrupt becomes asserted again.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (vgic_irq_is_mapped_level(irq) && (val & GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT)) {
> > +			irq->line_level = vgic_irq_line_level(irq);
> > +
> > +			if (!irq->line_level)
> > +				vgic_irq_clear_phys_active(irq);
> > +		}
> > +
> >  		spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> >  		vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> >  	}
> > @@ -161,6 +181,15 @@ void vgic_v2_populate_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_irq *irq, int lr)
> >  			val |= GICH_LR_EOI;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Level-triggered mapped IRQs are special because we only observe
> > +	 * rising edges as input to the VGIC.  We therefore lower the line
> > +	 * level here, so that we can take new virtual IRQs.  See
> > +	 * vgic_v2_fold_lr_state for more info.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (vgic_irq_is_mapped_level(irq) && (val & GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT))
> > +		irq->line_level = false;
> > +
> >  	/* The GICv2 LR only holds five bits of priority. */
> >  	val |= (irq->priority >> 3) << GICH_LR_PRIORITY_SHIFT;
> >  
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> > index 96ea597..e377036 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> > @@ -94,6 +94,26 @@ void vgic_v3_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  				irq->pending_latch = false;
> >  		}
> >  
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Level-triggered mapped IRQs are special because we only
> > +		 * observe rising edges as input to the VGIC.
> > +		 *
> > +		 * If the guest never acked the interrupt we have to sample
> > +		 * the physical line and set the line level, because the
> > +		 * device state could have changed or we simply need to
> > +		 * process the still pending interrupt later.
> > +		 *
> > +		 * If this causes us to lower the level, we have to also clear
> > +		 * the physical active state, since we will otherwise never be
> > +		 * told when the interrupt becomes asserted again.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (vgic_irq_is_mapped_level(irq) && (val & ICH_LR_PENDING_BIT)) {
> > +			irq->line_level = vgic_irq_line_level(irq);
> > +
> > +			if (!irq->line_level)
> > +				vgic_irq_clear_phys_active(irq);
> > +		}
> > +
> >  		spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> >  		vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> >  	}
> > @@ -144,6 +164,15 @@ void vgic_v3_populate_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_irq *irq, int lr)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/*
> > +	 * Level-triggered mapped IRQs are special because we only observe
> > +	 * rising edges as input to the VGIC.  We therefore lower the line
> > +	 * level here, so that we can take new virtual IRQs.  See
> > +	 * vgic_v3_fold_lr_state for more info.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (vgic_irq_is_mapped_level(irq) && (val & ICH_LR_PENDING_BIT))
> > +		irq->line_level = false;
> > +
> > +	/*
> >  	 * We currently only support Group1 interrupts, which is a
> >  	 * known defect. This needs to be addressed at some point.
> >  	 */
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> > index 9d557efd..2691a0a 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> > @@ -140,6 +140,29 @@ void vgic_put_irq(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq)
> >  	kfree(irq);
> >  }
> >  
> > +/* Get the input level of a mapped IRQ directly from the physical GIC */
> > +bool vgic_irq_line_level(struct vgic_irq *irq)
> 
> nit: it would make the above clearer if this was named something like
> vgic_irq_get_phys_line_level(), as the current name is pretty ambiguous
> about which side of the GIC we're looking at.
> 
Yes, absolutely.

> > +{
> > +	bool line_level;
> > +
> > +	BUG_ON(!irq->hw);
> > +
> > +	WARN_ON(irq_get_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq,
> > +				      IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING,
> > +				      &line_level));
> > +	return line_level;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Clear the physical active state */
> > +void vgic_irq_clear_phys_active(struct vgic_irq *irq)
> > +{
> > +
> > +	BUG_ON(!irq->hw);
> > +	WARN_ON(irq_set_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq,
> > +				      IRQCHIP_STATE_ACTIVE,
> > +				      false));
> > +}
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * kvm_vgic_target_oracle - compute the target vcpu for an irq
> >   *
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> > index bba7fa2..22f106d 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> > @@ -104,6 +104,11 @@ static inline bool irq_is_pending(struct vgic_irq *irq)
> >  		return irq->pending_latch || irq->line_level;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline bool vgic_irq_is_mapped_level(struct vgic_irq *irq)
> > +{
> > +	return irq->config == VGIC_CONFIG_LEVEL && irq->hw;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * This struct provides an intermediate representation of the fields contained
> >   * in the GICH_VMCR and ICH_VMCR registers, such that code exporting the GIC
> > @@ -140,6 +145,8 @@ vgic_get_mmio_region(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_io_device *iodev,
> >  struct vgic_irq *vgic_get_irq(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >  			      u32 intid);
> >  void vgic_put_irq(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq);
> > +bool vgic_irq_line_level(struct vgic_irq *irq);
> > +void vgic_irq_clear_phys_active(struct vgic_irq *irq);
> >  bool vgic_queue_irq_unlock(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq);
> >  void vgic_kick_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm);
> 
> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> 

Thanks!
-Christoffer



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list