[PATCH v4 17/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Propagate VLPI properties at map time

[Marc Zyngier]

On Wed, Oct 25 2017 at  6:48:27 pm BST, Christoffer Dall <cdall at linaro.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 04:33:52PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> When the VLPI gets mapped, it must inherit the configuration of
>> the LPI configured at the vITS level. For that purpose, let's make
>> update_lpi_config globally available and call it just after
>> having performed the VLPI map operation.
>> 
>> Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall at linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
>> ---
>>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 6 ++----
>>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c  | 2 ++
>>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h     | 2 ++
>>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> index eb72eb027060..f434748439ee 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> @@ -37,8 +37,6 @@
>>  static int vgic_its_save_tables_v0(struct vgic_its *its);
>>  static int vgic_its_restore_tables_v0(struct vgic_its *its);
>>  static int vgic_its_commit_v0(struct vgic_its *its);
>> -static int update_lpi_config(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
>> -			     struct kvm_vcpu *filter_vcpu, bool needs_inv);
>>  
>>  /*
>>   * Creates a new (reference to a) struct vgic_irq for a given LPI.
>> @@ -272,8 +270,8 @@ static struct its_collection *find_collection(struct vgic_its *its, int coll_id)
>>   * If filter_vcpu is not NULL, applies only if the IRQ is targeting this
>>   * VCPU. Unconditionally applies if filter_vcpu is NULL.
>>   */
>> -static int update_lpi_config(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
>> -			     struct kvm_vcpu *filter_vcpu, bool needs_inv)
>> +int update_lpi_config(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
>> +		      struct kvm_vcpu *filter_vcpu, bool needs_inv)
>>  {
>>  	u64 propbase = GICR_PROPBASER_ADDRESS(kvm->arch.vgic.propbaser);
>>  	u8 prop;
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
>> index ba1dd3162eba..b79a0450bb1c 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
>> @@ -147,6 +147,8 @@ int kvm_vgic_v4_set_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm, int virq,
>>  	irq->hw		= true;
>>  	irq->host_irq	= virq;
>>  
>> +	/* Force the property update and invalidate */
>> +	update_lpi_config(kvm, irq, NULL, true);
>
> Actually, when re-reading this patch, this looks weird to me.
>
> I think this needs to either be done as part of the map, or before the
> map, to prevent for example a disabled interrupt from the guest'ss PoV
> to fire when it doesn't expect it.

Indeed, that's a good point. I don't really like making it part of the
VLPI mapping, as this is an ITS thing (and the property update is more a
redistributor concept), but moving it it before the map is probably the
best thing to do. Thanks for pointing this out!

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.