[PATCH v5 3/6] perf: hisi: Add support for HiSilicon SoC L3C PMU driver
Zhangshaokun
zhangshaokun at hisilicon.com
Wed Oct 18 06:33:30 PDT 2017
Hi Mark,
On 2017/10/17 23:16, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 04:07:54PM +0800, Shaokun Zhang wrote:
>> +static int hisi_l3c_pmu_init_irq(struct hisi_pmu *l3c_pmu,
>> + struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + int irq, ret;
>> +
>> + /* Read and init IRQ */
>> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> + if (irq < 0) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "L3C PMU get irq fail; irq:%d\n", irq);
>> + return irq;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, hisi_l3c_pmu_isr,
>> + IRQF_NOBALANCING | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
>> + dev_name(&pdev->dev), l3c_pmu);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>> + "Fail to request IRQ:%d ret:%d\n", irq, ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + l3c_pmu->irq = irq;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Check whether the CPU is associated with this L3C PMU by SCCL_ID
>> + * and CCL_ID, if true, set the associated cpumask of the L3C PMU.
>> + */
>> +static void hisi_l3c_pmu_set_cpumask_by_ccl(void *arg)
>> +{
>> + struct hisi_pmu *l3c_pmu = (struct hisi_pmu *)arg;
>> + u32 ccl_id, sccl_id;
>> +
>> + hisi_read_sccl_and_ccl_id(&sccl_id, &ccl_id);
>> + if (sccl_id == l3c_pmu->sccl_id && ccl_id == l3c_pmu->ccl_id)
>> + cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &l3c_pmu->associated_cpus);
>> +}
>
> The shared code has hisi_uncore_pmu_set_cpumask_by_sccl(), and it would
> be nice to place this in the same place.
>
> Otherwise, the same comments apply here.
>
Ok, shall fix the same issues.
>> +
>> +static const struct acpi_device_id hisi_l3c_pmu_acpi_match[] = {
>> + { "HISI0213", },
>> + {},
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, hisi_l3c_pmu_acpi_match);
>> +
>> +static int hisi_l3c_pmu_init_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> + struct hisi_pmu *l3c_pmu)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long long id;
>> + struct resource *res;
>> + acpi_status status;
>> + int cpu;
>> +
>> + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev),
>> + "_UID", NULL, &id);
>> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + l3c_pmu->id = id;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Use the SCCL_ID and CCL_ID to identify the L3C PMU, while
>> + * SCCL_ID is in MPIDR[aff2] and CCL_ID is in MPIDR[aff1].
>> + */
>> + if (device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "hisilicon,scl-id",
>> + &l3c_pmu->sccl_id)) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can not read l3c sccl-id!\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "hisilicon,ccl-id",
>> + &l3c_pmu->ccl_id)) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can not read l3c ccl-id!\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Initialise the associated cpumask of the PMU */
>> + for_each_present_cpu(cpu)
>> + smp_call_function_single(cpu, hisi_l3c_pmu_set_cpumask_by_ccl,
>> + (void *)l3c_pmu, 1);
>
> Ah, so that's why hisi_uncore_pmu_set_cpumask_by_sccl took a void
> pointer.
>
> Please drop a comment above hisi_uncore_pmu_set_cpumask_by_sccl to cover
> that.
>
> I think you can drop the void cast here; I don't beleive it is
> necessary.
>
Ok.
> Rather than a proble-time smp_call_function_single(), can you follow the
> qcom l2's approach of associating CPUs with a PMU instance in the
> notifier? That will work even if CPUs are brought online very late.
>
A good guidance, but HHA and DDRC PMUs are different from L3C PMU, the former
share the same SCCL and the latter share the same SCCL and CCL. I will
try to deal with this difference in online notifier.
Thanks,
Shaokun
>> +
>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> + l3c_pmu->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>> + if (IS_ERR(l3c_pmu->base)) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "ioremap failed for l3c_pmu resource\n");
>> + return PTR_ERR(l3c_pmu->base);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
> .
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list