[PATCH v3 4/4] phy: rockchip-typec: Do the calibration more correctly
Kishon Vijay Abraham I
kishon at ti.com
Wed Oct 18 04:19:27 PDT 2017
On Friday 22 September 2017 10:14 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> Calculate the calibration code as per the docs. The docs talk about
> reading and averaging the pullup and pulldown calibration codes. They
> also talk about adding in some adjustment codes. Let's do what the
> docs say.
>
> In practice this doesn't seem to matter a whole lot. On a device I
> tested the pullup and pulldown codes were nearly the same (0x23 and
> 0x24) and the adjustment codes were 0.
>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Zhong <zyw at rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders at chromium.org>
merged the 3rd and 4th patch to next. Thanks!
-Kishon
> ---
>
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2:
> - Removed extra blank line.
>
> drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
> index 95f8f23676b4..a96635447d48 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
> @@ -560,24 +560,33 @@ static void tcphy_dp_aux_calibration(struct rockchip_typec_phy *tcphy)
> u16 val;
> u16 tx_ana_ctrl_reg_1;
> u16 tx_ana_ctrl_reg_2;
> - s32 pu_calib_code;
> -
> - /* disable txda_cal_latch_en for rewrite the calibration values */
> - tx_ana_ctrl_reg_1 = readl(tcphy->base + TX_ANA_CTRL_REG_1);
> - tx_ana_ctrl_reg_1 &= ~TXDA_CAL_LATCH_EN;
> - writel(tx_ana_ctrl_reg_1, tcphy->base + TX_ANA_CTRL_REG_1);
> + s32 pu_calib_code, pd_calib_code;
> + s32 pu_adj, pd_adj;
> + u16 calib;
>
> /*
> - * read a resistor calibration code from CMN_TXPUCAL_CTRL[5:0] and
> - * write it to TX_DIG_CTRL_REG_2[5:0].
> + * Calculate calibration code as per docs: use an average of the
> + * pull down and pull up. Then add in adjustments.
> */
> val = readl(tcphy->base + CMN_TXPUCAL_CTRL);
> pu_calib_code = CMN_CALIB_CODE_POS(val);
> + val = readl(tcphy->base + CMN_TXPDCAL_CTRL);
> + pd_calib_code = CMN_CALIB_CODE_POS(val);
> + val = readl(tcphy->base + CMN_TXPU_ADJ_CTRL);
> + pu_adj = CMN_CALIB_CODE(val);
> + val = readl(tcphy->base + CMN_TXPD_ADJ_CTRL);
> + pd_adj = CMN_CALIB_CODE(val);
> + calib = (pu_calib_code + pd_calib_code) / 2 + pu_adj + pd_adj;
> +
> + /* disable txda_cal_latch_en for rewrite the calibration values */
> + tx_ana_ctrl_reg_1 = readl(tcphy->base + TX_ANA_CTRL_REG_1);
> + tx_ana_ctrl_reg_1 &= ~TXDA_CAL_LATCH_EN;
> + writel(tx_ana_ctrl_reg_1, tcphy->base + TX_ANA_CTRL_REG_1);
>
> /* write the calibration, then delay 10 ms as sample in docs */
> val = readl(tcphy->base + TX_DIG_CTRL_REG_2);
> val &= ~(TX_RESCAL_CODE_MASK << TX_RESCAL_CODE_OFFSET);
> - val |= pu_calib_code << TX_RESCAL_CODE_OFFSET;
> + val |= calib << TX_RESCAL_CODE_OFFSET;
> writel(val, tcphy->base + TX_DIG_CTRL_REG_2);
> usleep_range(10000, 10050);
>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list