[PATCH v2 0/4] SMMUv3 CMD_SYNC optimisation
Robin Murphy
robin.murphy at arm.com
Mon Oct 16 06:18:00 PDT 2017
On 13/10/17 20:05, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Robin,
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 02:44:24PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> Since Nate reported a reasonable performance boost from the out-of-line
>> MSI polling in v1 [1], I've now implemented the equivalent for cons
>> polling as well - that has been boot-tested on D05 with some trivial I/O
>> and at least doesn't seem to lock up or explode. There's also a little
>> cosmetic tweaking to make the patches a bit cleaner as a series.
>>
>> Robin.
>>
>> [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org/msg19657.html
>>
>> Robin Murphy (5):
>> iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Specialise CMD_SYNC handling
>> iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Forget about cmdq-sync interrupt
>> iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use CMD_SYNC completion interrupt
>> iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Poll for CMD_SYNC outside cmdq lock
>> iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use burst-polling for sync completion
>
> What's this final mythical patch about? I don't see it in the series.
It's in the place 5/5 would be, I just tagged it as [RFT] since I have
zero evidence whether it's worth the bother or not.
> Anyway, the first two patches look fine to me, but this doesn't apply
> on top of my iommu/devel branch so they will need rebasing.
Will do.
Thanks for the review,
Robin.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list