[PATCH 1/2] irqdesc: Add function to identify percpu_devid irqs
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Fri Oct 13 03:52:08 PDT 2017
Hi Julien,
On 13/10/17 11:44, Julien Thierry wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry at arm.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/irqdesc.h | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqdesc.h b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
> index 3e90a09..93960cf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqdesc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
> @@ -244,6 +244,14 @@ static inline int irq_is_percpu(unsigned int irq)
> return desc->status_use_accessors & IRQ_PER_CPU;
> }
>
> +static inline int irq_is_percpu_devid(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + struct irq_desc *desc;
> +
> + desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> + return desc->status_use_accessors & IRQ_PER_CPU_DEVID;
> +}
> +
> static inline void
> irq_set_lockdep_class(unsigned int irq, struct lock_class_key *class)
> {
> --
> 1.9.1
>
Please write a proper commit message (for example explaining why
irq_is_percpu is not necessarily the right thing). A cover letter also
wouldn't hurt (that's pretty much customary if you send more than a
single patch).
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list