iMX6 PCIE IRQ not working with ath9k based Wifi
Mike Tubby
mike at tubby.org
Mon Oct 9 05:08:35 PDT 2017
On 10/9/2017 1:03 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Mike Tubby <mike at tubby.org> wrote:
>> On 10/9/2017 11:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> Thanks for your reply.
>>
>> Here is the output of 'lspic -tv' and 'lspic -v':
>>
>> root at arm:/boot/uboot# lspci -tv
>> -[0000:00]---00.0-[01]----00.0 Qualcomm Atheros AR93xx Wireless Network
>> Adapter
>> root at arm:/boot/uboot#
> Ok, so no bridge, right?
Correct - its a mPCIE socket connected directly in to an Embedian FiMX6
SMARC module.
>
>> If I look at the 'Capabilities [50]' on the PCI bridge I see 'Enable+' and
>> on the Atheros kernel driver (ath9k) I see 'Enable-' -- this appears to
>> suggest a mis-match.
> This just means that the host supports MSI in principle, that's not
> a problem.
>
>> If I understand correctly the ath9k driver in kernel 4.1.15 we're using
>> doesn't enable MSI - so I assume that there is some backwards compatibility
>> mode that then is not working because MSI is enabled at the CPU end, and
>> hence the patch you referred to is used to turn this off.
>> At the same time on the mailing list:
>>
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org/msg14332.html
>>
>> which is part of:
>>
>> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k
>>
>> there is talk of a patch to the ath9k driver to properly implement MSI in
>> the updated driver in kernel 4.6
>>
>> So, for us the question is which way to head:
>>
>> a) disable MSI at the CPU and try to use legacy; or
>>
>> b) update the ath9k driver to try and enable MSI ?
>>
>>
>> We will also check the DTS/DTB in case something is mis-assigned.
> You can try enabling MSI for debugging, but it shouldn't
> be necessary. There is no reason for the driver to enable
> MSI here, it would only add more latency to the interrupt
> path on this hardware AFAICT.
>
> Arnd
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list