[PATCH v2 3/5] mm: memory_hotplug: memblock to track partially removed vmemmap mem
Michal Hocko
mhocko at kernel.org
Thu Nov 30 06:51:34 PST 2017
On Thu 23-11-17 11:14:38, Andrea Reale wrote:
> When hot-removing memory we need to free vmemmap memory.
> However, depending on the memory is being removed, it might
> not be always possible to free a full vmemmap page / huge-page
> because part of it might still be used.
>
> Commit ae9aae9eda2d ("memory-hotplug: common APIs to support page tables
> hot-remove") introduced a workaround for x86
> hot-remove, by which partially unused areas are filled with
> the 0xFD constant. Full pages are only removed when fully
> filled by 0xFDs.
>
> This commit introduces a MEMBLOCK_UNUSED_VMEMMAP memblock flag, with
> the goal of using it in place of 0xFDs. For now, this will be used for
> the arm64 port of memory hot remove, but the idea is to eventually use
> the same mechanism for x86 as well.
Why cannot you use the same approach as x86 have? Have a look at the
vmemmap_free at al.
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Reale <ar at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Bielski <m.bielski at virtualopensystems.com>
> ---
> include/linux/memblock.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> mm/memblock.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index bae11c7..0daec05 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ enum {
> MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG = 0x1, /* hotpluggable region */
> MEMBLOCK_MIRROR = 0x2, /* mirrored region */
> MEMBLOCK_NOMAP = 0x4, /* don't add to kernel direct mapping */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> + MEMBLOCK_UNUSED_VMEMMAP = 0x8, /* Mark VMEMAP blocks as dirty */
> +#endif
> };
>
> struct memblock_region {
> @@ -90,6 +93,10 @@ int memblock_mark_mirror(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> int memblock_mark_nomap(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> int memblock_clear_nomap(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> ulong choose_memblock_flags(void);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +int memblock_mark_unused_vmemmap(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> +int memblock_clear_unused_vmemmap(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> +#endif
>
> /* Low level functions */
> int memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type,
> @@ -182,6 +189,11 @@ static inline bool memblock_is_nomap(struct memblock_region *m)
> return m->flags & MEMBLOCK_NOMAP;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +bool memblock_is_vmemmap_unused_range(struct memblock_type *mt,
> + phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end);
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
> int memblock_search_pfn_nid(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long *start_pfn,
> unsigned long *end_pfn);
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 9120578..30d5aa4 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -809,6 +809,18 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_clear_nomap(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> return memblock_setclr_flag(base, size, 0, MEMBLOCK_NOMAP);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +int __init_memblock memblock_mark_unused_vmemmap(phys_addr_t base,
> + phys_addr_t size)
> +{
> + return memblock_setclr_flag(base, size, 1, MEMBLOCK_UNUSED_VMEMMAP);
> +}
> +int __init_memblock memblock_clear_unused_vmemmap(phys_addr_t base,
> + phys_addr_t size)
> +{
> + return memblock_setclr_flag(base, size, 0, MEMBLOCK_UNUSED_VMEMMAP);
> +}
> +#endif
> /**
> * __next_reserved_mem_region - next function for for_each_reserved_region()
> * @idx: pointer to u64 loop variable
> @@ -1696,6 +1708,26 @@ void __init_memblock memblock_trim_memory(phys_addr_t align)
> }
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +bool __init_memblock memblock_is_vmemmap_unused_range(struct memblock_type *mt,
> + phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
> +{
> + u64 i;
> + struct memblock_region *r;
> +
> + i = memblock_search(mt, start);
> + r = &(mt->regions[i]);
> + while (r->base < end) {
> + if (!(r->flags & MEMBLOCK_UNUSED_VMEMMAP))
> + return 0;
> +
> + r = &(memblock.memory.regions[++i]);
> + }
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> void __init_memblock memblock_set_current_limit(phys_addr_t limit)
> {
> memblock.current_limit = limit;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo at kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont at kvack.org"> email at kvack.org </a>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list