[PATCH 2/3] thermal: armada: add support for AP806
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at armlinux.org.uk
Thu Nov 23 07:24:17 PST 2017
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 04:42:04PM +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
> The AP806 component is integrated in the Armada 8k and 7k lines of processors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> index ae75328945f7..1f7f81628040 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@
> #define A375_HW_RESETn BIT(8)
> #define A380_HW_RESET BIT(8)
>
> +#define AP806_START BIT(0)
> +#define AP806_RESET BIT(1)
> +#define AP806_ENABLE BIT(2)
> +
> struct armada_thermal_data;
>
> /* Marvell EBU Thermal Sensor Dev Structure */
> @@ -147,6 +151,18 @@ static void armada380_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev,
> }
> }
>
> +static void armada_ap806_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct armada_thermal_priv *priv)
> +{
> + u32 reg = readl_relaxed(priv->control);
> +
> + reg &= ~AP806_RESET;
> + reg |= AP806_START;
> + reg |= AP806_ENABLE;
> + writel(reg, priv->control);
> + mdelay(10);
Do you really need to make the CPU busy-wait for 10ms here? This
looks like it's called from a schedulable context, so won't msleep()
do?
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list