[PATCH v3 0/3] KVM: arm64: single step emulation instructions
Alex Bennée
alex.bennee at linaro.org
Tue Nov 21 04:43:12 PST 2017
Christoffer Dall <cdall at linaro.org> writes:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 03:39:18PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is rev 3 of the series, practically the same than rev 2 but fixed
>> a return 1->0 in the kvm_run loop that Julien caught. I've added his
>> r-b tags to the other patches.
>>
>> As usual revision details bellow the --- in each patch.
>
> Thanks for taking care of this.
>
> I have applied the series and slightly tweaked the commit messages and
> commentary.
>
> Did we simply decide to not worry about exiting to userspace if we do
> fast-path emulation, such as for the errata workaround and GIC
> mashaling in switch.c ?
Compile tested only:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
kvm: arm64: handle single-step of hyp emulated mmio
There is a fast-path of MMIO emulation inside hyp mode. The handling
of single-step is broadly the same as kvm_arm_handle_step_debug()
except we just setup ESR/HSR so handle_exit() does the correct thing
as we exit.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee at linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
index 945e79c641c4..841dc79d11fd 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
@@ -263,7 +263,11 @@ static bool __hyp_text __populate_fault_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return true;
}
-static void __hyp_text __skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+/* Skip an instruction which has been emulated. Returns true if
+ * execution can continue or false if we need to exit hyp mode because
+ * single-step was in effect.
+ */
+static bool __hyp_text __skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(elr);
@@ -276,6 +280,14 @@ static void __hyp_text __skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), elr);
+
+ if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP) {
+ vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2 =
+ (ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT) | 0x22;
+ return false;
+ } else {
+ return true;
+ }
}
int __hyp_text __kvm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -336,8 +348,10 @@ int __hyp_text __kvm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
int ret = __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(vcpu);
if (ret == 1) {
- __skip_instr(vcpu);
- goto again;
+ if (__skip_instr(vcpu))
+ goto again;
+ else
+ exit_code = ARM_EXCEPTION_TRAP;
}
if (ret == -1) {
@@ -357,8 +371,10 @@ int __hyp_text __kvm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
int ret = __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(vcpu);
if (ret == 1) {
- __skip_instr(vcpu);
- goto again;
+ if (__skip_instr(vcpu))
+ goto again;
+ else
+ exit_code = ARM_EXCEPTION_TRAP;
}
/* 0 falls through to be handled out of EL2 */
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list