n900 in next-20170901

Joonsoo Kim iamjoonsoo.kim at lge.com
Wed Nov 8 16:36:39 PST 2017


On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 04:11:13PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim at lge.com> [171109 00:05]:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:34:13AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim at lge.com> [171108 07:43]:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 07:48:42AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > > So it seems the issue is currently at the atomic_pool_init()
> > > > > related code?
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, your test showed it although I can't find any clue in
> > > > atomic_pool_init().
> > > > 
> > > > Could you test updated branch?
> > > > 
> > > > https://github.com/JoonsooKim/linux/tree/cma-debug4-next-20180901
> > > > 
> > > > There are two relevant commits.
> > > > 
> > > > arm/dma: stop dma allocation before __dma_alloc_remap()
> > > > arm/dma: disable atomic pool after dma allocation
> > > > 
> > > > atomic pool initialization will be done partially to check
> > > > exact point of failure. These are brain-dead commits however I have no
> > > > idea what's going on here until now. :/
> > > 
> > > OK that booted, dmesg output below. Hopefully that provides
> > > you with some more clues.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Could you let me know which one is booted? Both of them? or just top
> > commit ("arm/dma: stop dma allocation before __dma_alloc_remap()")?
> 
> Oh OK. Only the top commit boots.

Okay! I will try to analyze!

Thanks.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list