[PATCH v3 0/9] irqchip: stm32: add stm32h7 support

[Alexandre Torgue]

Hi

On 11/07/2017 02:06 PM, Ludovic BARRE wrote:
> hi Marc
> 
> normally, Alex take the last 3 ("ARM: dts")
> commits in his branch, and will send in his pull request
> Alex you confirm?

Yes. I will merge DT patches in my next pull request (for 4.
16)

Regards
Alex

> 
> BR
> Ludo
> 
> On 11/07/2017 12:23 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Hi Ludovic,
>>
>> On 06/11/17 17:03, Ludovic Barre wrote:
>>> From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre at st.com>
>>>
>>> This series adds:
>>> -Management of multi-bank of external interrupts
>>> stm32h7 has up to 96 inputs (3 banks of  32 inputs).
>>> -Fix initial value after cold/hot boot (wakeup issue).
>>>
>>> Changes v3:
>>> -remove chip.name and handler, already done by
>>> irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips
>>> -add Rob ack in dt-bindings commit
>>>
>>> Changes v2:
>>> -Remove irq_mask and adds const on struct stm32_exti_bank
>>> -Add wrapper functions pending and ack
>>> -Replace BITS_PER_LONG by IRQS_PER_BANK
>>> -Fill commit message on
>>> "ARM: dts: stm32: add support of exti on stm32h743"
>>> -Add system config bank for stm32h7
>>>
>>> Ludovic Barre (9):
>>>    irqchip: stm32: select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
>>>    irqchip: stm32: add multi-bank management
>>>    dt-bindings: interrupt-controllers: add compatible string for stm32h7
>>>    irqchip: stm32: add stm32h7 support
>>>    irqchip: stm32: fix initial values
>>>    irqchip: stm32: move the wakeup on interrupt mask
>>>    ARM: dts: stm32: add exti support for stm32h743
>>>    ARM: dts: stm32: add system config bank node for stm32h743
>>>    ARM: dts: stm32: add support of exti on stm32h743 pinctrl
>>>
>>>   .../interrupt-controller/st,stm32-exti.txt         |   4 +-
>>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743-pinctrl.dtsi           |  24 +++
>>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi                   |  13 ++
>>>   drivers/irqchip/Kconfig                            |   1 +
>>>   drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c                   | 206 
>>> ++++++++++++++++-----
>>>   5 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> I'm happy to take the first 6 patches through the irqchip tree. How
>> about the last 3? I'd rather see them routed via armsoc if there is any
>> risk of merge conflicts.
>>
>> How do you want to proceed?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>     M.
>>