[RFCv2 PATCH 05/36] iommu/process: Bind and unbind process to and from devices

Jean-Philippe Brucker jean-philippe.brucker at arm.com
Thu Nov 2 09:21:17 PDT 2017


On 21/10/17 16:47, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Just some improvement suggestions.
> 
> On 10/6/2017 9:31 AM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
>> +	spin_lock(&iommu_process_lock);
>> +	idr_for_each_entry(&iommu_process_idr, process, i) {
>> +		if (process->pid != pid)
>> +			continue;
> if you see this construct a lot, this could be a for_each_iommu_process.
> 
>> +
>> +		if (!iommu_process_get_locked(process)) {
>> +			/* Process is defunct, create a new one */
>> +			process = NULL;
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		/* Great, is it also bound to this domain? */
>> +		list_for_each_entry(cur_context, &process->domains,
>> +				    process_head) {
>> +			if (cur_context->domain != domain)
>> +				continue;
> if you see this construct a lot, this could be a for_each_iommu_process_domain.
> 
>> +
>> +			context = cur_context;
>> +			*pasid = process->pasid;
>> +
>> +			/* Splendid, tell the driver and increase the ref */
>> +			err = iommu_process_attach_locked(context, dev);
>> +			if (err)
>> +				iommu_process_put_locked(process);
>> +
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +		break;
>> +	}
>> +	spin_unlock(&iommu_process_lock);
>> +	put_pid(pid);
>> +
>> +	if (context)
>> +		return err;
> 
> I think you should make the section above a independent function and return here when the
> context is found.

Hopefully this code will only be needed for bind(), but moving it to a
separate function should look better.

Thanks,
Jean




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list