[PATCH v2 linux-next 3/3] spi: imx: Add support for SPI Slave mode
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Wed May 31 05:10:37 PDT 2017
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:19:58AM -0700, jiada_wang at mentor.com wrote:
> From: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang at mentor.com>
>
> Previously i.MX SPI controller only works in Master mode.
> This patch adds support to i.MX51, i.MX53 and i.MX6 ECSPI
> controller to work also in Slave mode.
>
> Currently SPI Slave mode support patch has the following limitations:
> 1. The stale data in RXFIFO will be dropped when the Slave does any new
> transfer.
> 2. One transfer can be finished only after all transfer->len data been
> transferred to master device
> 3. Slave device only accepts transfer->len data. Any data longer than this
> from master device will be dropped. Any data shorter than this from
> master will cause SPI to stuck due to mentioned HW limitation 2.
> 4. Only PIO transfer is supported in Slave mode.
>
> Following HW limitation applies:
> 1. ECSPI has a HW issue when works in Slave mode, after 64
> words written to TXFIFO, even TXFIFO becomes empty,
> ECSPI_TXDATA keeps shift out the last word data,
> so we have to disable ECSPI when in slave mode after the
> transfer completes
> 2. Due to Freescale errata ERR003775 "eCSPI: Burst completion by Chip
> Select (SS) signal in Slave mode is not functional" burst size must
> be set exactly to the size of the transfer. This limit SPI transaction
> with maximum 2^12 bits. This errata affects i.MX53 and i.MX6 ECSPI
> controllers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang at mentor.com>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-imx.c | 227 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 195 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> index 765856c..a227a30 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> @@ -53,9 +53,13 @@
> /* generic defines to abstract from the different register layouts */
> #define MXC_INT_RR (1 << 0) /* Receive data ready interrupt */
> #define MXC_INT_TE (1 << 1) /* Transmit FIFO empty interrupt */
> +#define MXC_INT_RDR BIT(4) /* Receive date threshold interrupt */
>
> /* The maximum bytes that a sdma BD can transfer.*/
> #define MAX_SDMA_BD_BYTES (1 << 15)
> +/* The maximum bytes that IMX53_ECSPI can transfer in slave mode.*/
> +#define MX53_MAX_TRANSFER_BYTES 512
> +
> struct spi_imx_config {
> unsigned int speed_hz;
> unsigned int bpw;
> @@ -79,6 +83,7 @@ struct spi_imx_devtype_data {
> void (*trigger)(struct spi_imx_data *);
> int (*rx_available)(struct spi_imx_data *);
> void (*reset)(struct spi_imx_data *);
> + void (*disable)(struct spi_imx_data *);
> enum spi_imx_devtype devtype;
> };
>
> @@ -105,6 +110,11 @@ struct spi_imx_data {
> const void *tx_buf;
> unsigned int txfifo; /* number of words pushed in tx FIFO */
>
> + /* Slave mode */
> + bool slave_mode;
> + bool slave_aborted;
> + unsigned int slave_burst;
> +
> /* DMA */
> bool usedma;
> u32 wml;
> @@ -157,6 +167,17 @@ static inline bool spi_imx_has_dmamode(struct spi_imx_data *d)
> }
> }
>
> +static inline bool spi_imx_has_slavemode(const struct spi_imx_devtype_data *d)
> +{
> + switch (d->devtype) {
> + case IMX51_ECSPI:
> + case IMX53_ECSPI:
> + return true;
> + default:
> + return false;
> + }
> +}
Add a new boolean flag to struct spi_imx_devtype_data instead.
> +
> #define MXC_SPI_BUF_RX(type) \
> static void spi_imx_buf_rx_##type(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx) \
> { \
> @@ -287,6 +308,7 @@ static bool spi_imx_can_dma(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_device *spi,
> #define MX51_ECSPI_INT 0x10
> #define MX51_ECSPI_INT_TEEN (1 << 0)
> #define MX51_ECSPI_INT_RREN (1 << 3)
> +#define MX51_ECSPI_INT_RDREN (1 << 4)
>
> #define MX51_ECSPI_DMA 0x14
> #define MX51_ECSPI_DMA_TX_WML(wml) ((wml) & 0x3f)
> @@ -303,6 +325,51 @@ static bool spi_imx_can_dma(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_device *spi,
> #define MX51_ECSPI_TESTREG 0x20
> #define MX51_ECSPI_TESTREG_LBC BIT(31)
>
> +static void mx53_ecspi_rx_slave(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx)
> +{
> + u32 val = be32_to_cpu(readl(spi_imx->base + MXC_CSPIRXDATA));
> +
> + if (spi_imx->rx_buf) {
> + int shift = spi_imx->slave_burst % sizeof(val);
> +
> + if (shift) {
> + memcpy(spi_imx->rx_buf,
> + ((u8 *)&val) + sizeof(val) - shift, shift);
> + } else {
> + *((u32 *)spi_imx->rx_buf) = val;
> + shift = sizeof(val);
> + }
> +
> + spi_imx->rx_buf += shift;
> + spi_imx->slave_burst -= shift;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void mx53_ecspi_tx_slave(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx)
> +{
> + u32 val = 0;
> + int shift = spi_imx->count % sizeof(val);
> +
> + if (spi_imx->tx_buf) {
> + if (shift) {
> + memcpy(((u8 *)&val) + sizeof(val) - shift,
> + spi_imx->tx_buf, shift);
> + } else {
> + val = *((u32 *)spi_imx->tx_buf);
> + shift = sizeof(val);
> + }
> + val = cpu_to_be32(val);
> + spi_imx->tx_buf += shift;
> + }
> +
> + if (!shift)
> + shift = sizeof(val);
A better name for 'shift' is n_bytes. Its value should be calculated
before the if (spi_imx->tx_buf) block. Then you can use memcpy for the
four byte case aswell.
But anyway, have you tested this function for anything with
spi_imx->count % sizeof(val) != 0? In this case you have to put the fill
the FIFO only partly somewhere. I would assume you have to do this at
the end of the transfer, but you do this at the beginning. Can this
work?
> +
> + spi_imx->count -= shift;
> +
> + writel(val, spi_imx->base + MXC_CSPITXDATA);
> +}
> +
> /* MX51 eCSPI */
> static unsigned int mx51_ecspi_clkdiv(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx,
> unsigned int fspi, unsigned int *fres)
> @@ -352,6 +419,9 @@ static void mx51_ecspi_intctrl(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx, int enable)
> if (enable & MXC_INT_RR)
> val |= MX51_ECSPI_INT_RREN;
>
> + if (enable & MXC_INT_RDR)
> + val |= MX51_ECSPI_INT_RDREN;
> +
> writel(val, spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_INT);
> }
>
> @@ -364,6 +434,15 @@ static void mx51_ecspi_trigger(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx)
> writel(reg, spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_CTRL);
> }
>
> +static void __maybe_unused mx51_ecspi_disable(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx)
I don't see how this function may end up unused.
> +{
> + u32 ctrl;
> +
> + ctrl = readl(spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_CTRL);
> + ctrl &= ~MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_ENABLE;
> + writel(ctrl, spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_CTRL);
> +}
> +
> static int mx51_ecspi_config(struct spi_device *spi,
> struct spi_imx_config *config)
> {
> @@ -372,14 +451,11 @@ static int mx51_ecspi_config(struct spi_device *spi,
> u32 clk = config->speed_hz, delay, reg;
> u32 cfg = readl(spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_CONFIG);
>
> - /*
> - * The hardware seems to have a race condition when changing modes. The
> - * current assumption is that the selection of the channel arrives
> - * earlier in the hardware than the mode bits when they are written at
> - * the same time.
> - * So set master mode for all channels as we do not support slave mode.
> - */
> - ctrl |= MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_MODE_MASK;
> + /* set Master or Slave mode */
> + if (spi_imx->slave_mode)
> + ctrl &= ~MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_MODE_MASK;
> + else
> + ctrl |= MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_MODE_MASK;
>
> /*
> * Enable SPI_RDY handling (falling edge/level triggered).
> @@ -394,9 +470,21 @@ static int mx51_ecspi_config(struct spi_device *spi,
> /* set chip select to use */
> ctrl |= MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_CS(spi->chip_select);
>
> - ctrl |= (config->bpw - 1) << MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_BL_OFFSET;
> + if (spi_imx->slave_mode && is_imx53_ecspi(spi_imx))
> + ctrl |= (spi_imx->slave_burst * 8 - 1)
> + << MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_BL_OFFSET;
> + else
> + ctrl |= (config->bpw - 1) << MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_BL_OFFSET;
>
> - cfg |= MX51_ECSPI_CONFIG_SBBCTRL(spi->chip_select);
> + /*
> + * eCSPI burst completion by Chip Select signal in Slave mode
> + * is not functional for imx53 Soc, config SPI burst completed when
> + * BURST_LENGTH + 1 bits are received
> + */
> + if (spi_imx->slave_mode && is_imx53_ecspi(spi_imx))
> + cfg &= ~MX51_ECSPI_CONFIG_SBBCTRL(spi->chip_select);
> + else
> + cfg |= MX51_ECSPI_CONFIG_SBBCTRL(spi->chip_select);
>
> if (spi->mode & SPI_CPHA)
> cfg |= MX51_ECSPI_CONFIG_SCLKPHA(spi->chip_select);
> @@ -775,6 +863,7 @@ static struct spi_imx_devtype_data imx51_ecspi_devtype_data = {
> .trigger = mx51_ecspi_trigger,
> .rx_available = mx51_ecspi_rx_available,
> .reset = mx51_ecspi_reset,
> + .disable = mx51_ecspi_disable,
> .devtype = IMX51_ECSPI,
> };
>
> @@ -784,6 +873,7 @@ static struct spi_imx_devtype_data imx53_ecspi_devtype_data = {
> .trigger = mx51_ecspi_trigger,
> .rx_available = mx51_ecspi_rx_available,
> .reset = mx51_ecspi_reset,
> + .disable = mx51_ecspi_disable,
> .devtype = IMX53_ECSPI,
> };
>
> @@ -846,14 +936,16 @@ static void spi_imx_push(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx)
> spi_imx->txfifo++;
> }
>
> - spi_imx->devtype_data->trigger(spi_imx);
> + if (!spi_imx->slave_mode)
> + spi_imx->devtype_data->trigger(spi_imx);
> }
>
> static irqreturn_t spi_imx_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> {
> struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx = dev_id;
>
> - while (spi_imx->devtype_data->rx_available(spi_imx)) {
> + while (spi_imx->txfifo &&
> + spi_imx->devtype_data->rx_available(spi_imx)) {
> spi_imx->rx(spi_imx);
> spi_imx->txfifo--;
> }
> @@ -952,7 +1044,8 @@ static int spi_imx_setupxfer(struct spi_device *spi,
> spi_imx->tx = spi_imx_buf_tx_u32;
> }
>
> - if (spi_imx_can_dma(spi_imx->bitbang.master, spi, t))
> + if (!spi_imx->slave_mode &&
> + spi_imx_can_dma(spi_imx->bitbang.master, spi, t))
> spi_imx->usedma = 1;
So in spi_imx_can_dma() you may return true for a slave mode transfer
and here we end up doing PIO for the same transfer. That doesn't look
correct. You should move the test for slave mode into spi_imx_can_dma().
> else
> spi_imx->usedma = 0;
> @@ -964,6 +1057,12 @@ static int spi_imx_setupxfer(struct spi_device *spi,
> return ret;
> }
>
> + if (is_imx53_ecspi(spi_imx) && spi_imx->slave_mode) {
> + spi_imx->rx = mx53_ecspi_rx_slave;
> + spi_imx->tx = mx53_ecspi_tx_slave;
> + spi_imx->slave_burst = t->len;
> + }
> +
> spi_imx->devtype_data->config(spi, &config);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -1125,16 +1224,50 @@ static int spi_imx_pio_transfer(struct spi_device *spi,
> struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
> unsigned long transfer_timeout;
> unsigned long timeout;
> + int ret = transfer->len;
> +
> + if (is_imx53_ecspi(spi_imx) && spi_imx->slave_mode &&
> + transfer->len > MX53_MAX_TRANSFER_BYTES) {
> + pr_err("Transaction too big, max size is %d bytes\n",
> + MX53_MAX_TRANSFER_BYTES);
Don't use pr_* functions when you have a struct device * available.
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
> + }
>
> spi_imx->tx_buf = transfer->tx_buf;
> spi_imx->rx_buf = transfer->rx_buf;
> spi_imx->count = transfer->len;
> spi_imx->txfifo = 0;
>
> + if (spi_imx->slave_mode)
> + spi_imx->slave_burst = spi_imx->count;
You have set this in spi_imx_setupxfer() already. Why here again?
> +
> reinit_completion(&spi_imx->xfer_done);
> + spi_imx->slave_aborted = false;
>
> spi_imx_push(spi_imx);
>
> + if (spi_imx->slave_mode) {
> + spi_imx->devtype_data->intctrl(spi_imx, MXC_INT_TE |
> + MXC_INT_RDR);
> +
> + if (wait_for_completion_interruptible(&spi_imx->xfer_done) ||
> + spi_imx->slave_aborted) {
> + dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "interrupted\n");
> + ret = -EINTR;
> + }
> +
> + /* ecspi has a HW issue when works in Slave mode,
> + * after 64 words writtern to TXFIFO, even TXFIFO becomes empty,
> + * ECSPI_TXDATA keeps shift out the last word data,
> + * so we have to disable ECSPI when in slave mode after the
> + * transfer completes
> + */
> + if (spi_imx->devtype_data->disable)
> + spi_imx->devtype_data->disable(spi_imx);
> +
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> spi_imx->devtype_data->intctrl(spi_imx, MXC_INT_TE);
>
> transfer_timeout = spi_imx_calculate_timeout(spi_imx, transfer->len);
You are adding more lines to spi_imx_pio_transfer() than the original
function had, most of them inside a if(spi_imx->slave_mode).
It would probably more readable if you introduced a separate
spi_imx_pio_transfer_slave().
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list