[RFC v1 6/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Rearrange msi resv alloc functions
Robin Murphy
robin.murphy at arm.com
Tue May 16 06:27:50 PDT 2017
On 13/05/17 10:47, shameer wrote:
> This moves the SW MSI reserve region allocation to probe fn.
Why?
> Signed-off-by: shameer <shameerali.kolothum.thodi at huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 770cc9e..e7a8a50 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -619,6 +619,9 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
>
> /* IOMMU core code handle */
> struct iommu_device iommu;
> +
> + /* MSI Reserve region */
> + struct iommu_resv_region *msi_region;
> };
>
> /* SMMU private data for each master */
> @@ -1960,15 +1963,12 @@ static int arm_smmu_of_xlate(struct device *dev, struct of_phandle_args *args)
> static void arm_smmu_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev,
> struct list_head *head)
> {
> - struct iommu_resv_region *region;
> - int prot = IOMMU_WRITE | IOMMU_NOEXEC | IOMMU_MMIO;
> -
> - region = iommu_alloc_resv_region(MSI_IOVA_BASE, MSI_IOVA_LENGTH,
> - prot, IOMMU_RESV_SW_MSI);
> - if (!region)
> - return;
> + struct iommu_domain *domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
> + struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
There's never any need for the domain dance if you don't need the
domain, just pull the smmu out of the device's iommu_fwspec.
> - list_add_tail(®ion->list, head);
> + if (smmu && smmu->msi_region)
> + list_add_tail(&smmu->msi_region->list, head);
Have you considered what happens for the second and subsequent domains
allocated on this SMMU? I can't see that ending well.
Robin.
> iommu_dma_get_resv_regions(dev, head);
> }
> @@ -1978,8 +1978,13 @@ static void arm_smmu_put_resv_regions(struct device *dev,
> {
> struct iommu_resv_region *entry, *next;
>
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, next, head, list)
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, next, head, list) {
> + if (entry->type == IOMMU_RESV_SW_MSI ||
> + entry->type == IOMMU_RESV_MSI)
> + continue;
> +
> kfree(entry);
> + }
> }
>
> static struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops = {
> @@ -2711,6 +2716,17 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static struct iommu_resv_region *arm_smmu_alloc_msi_region(
> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> + struct iommu_resv_region *region;
> + int prot = IOMMU_WRITE | IOMMU_NOEXEC | IOMMU_MMIO;
> +
> + region = iommu_alloc_resv_region(MSI_IOVA_BASE, MSI_IOVA_LENGTH,
> + prot, IOMMU_RESV_SW_MSI);
> + return region;
> +}
> +
> static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> int irq, ret;
> @@ -2756,6 +2772,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (irq > 0)
> smmu->gerr_irq = irq;
>
> + smmu->msi_region = arm_smmu_alloc_msi_region(smmu);
> +
> if (dev->of_node) {
> ret = arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(pdev, smmu);
> } else {
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list