[PATCH 2/2] kvm: arm/arm64: Fix use after free of stage2 page table
Suzuki K Poulose
Suzuki.Poulose at arm.com
Mon May 15 10:51:26 PDT 2017
On 15/05/17 18:43, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 02:36:58PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> On 15/05/17 11:00, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>> Hi Suzuki,
>>> So I don't think this change is wrong, but I wonder if it's sufficient.
>>> For example, I can see that this function is called from
>>>
>>> stage2_unmsp_vm
>>> -> stage2_unmap_memslot
>>> -> unmap_stage2_range
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot
>>> -> unmap_stage2_range
>>>
>>> which never check if the pgd pointer is valid,
>>
>> You are right. Those two callers do not check it. We could fix all of this by simply
>> moving the check to the beginning of the loop.
>> i.e, something like this :
>>
>> @@ -295,6 +295,12 @@ static void unmap_stage2_range(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t start, u64 size)
>> assert_spin_locked(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>> pgd = kvm->arch.pgd + stage2_pgd_index(addr);
>> do {
>> + /*
>> + * Make sure the page table is still active, as we could
>> + * another thread could have possibly freed the page table.
>> + */
>> + if (!READ_ONCE(kvm->arch.pgd))
>> + break;
>> next = stage2_pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
>> if (!stage2_pgd_none(*pgd))
>> unmap_stage2_puds(kvm, pgd, addr, next);
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> and finally, kvm_free_stage2_pgd also checks the pgd pointer outside of holding the
>>> kvm->mmu_lock so why is this not racy?
>>
>> This has been fixed by patch 1 in the series. So should be fine.
>>
>>
>> I can respin the patch with the changes if you are OK with it.
>>
> Yes, absolutely. I've already applied patch 1 so no need to include
> that in your respin.
I have made a minor change to the 1st patch, to make use of READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE,
to make sure we don't use the cached value of the kvm->arch.pgd. Something like :
@@ -829,22 +829,22 @@ void stage2_unmap_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
* Walks the level-1 page table pointed to by kvm->arch.pgd and frees all
* underlying level-2 and level-3 tables before freeing the actual level-1 table
* and setting the struct pointer to NULL.
- *
- * Note we don't need locking here as this is only called when the VM is
- * destroyed, which can only be done once.
*/
void kvm_free_stage2_pgd(struct kvm *kvm)
{
- if (kvm->arch.pgd == NULL)
- return;
+ void *pgd = NULL;
spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
- unmap_stage2_range(kvm, 0, KVM_PHYS_SIZE);
+ if (kvm->arch.pgd) {
+ unmap_stage2_range(kvm, 0, KVM_PHYS_SIZE);
+ pgd = READ_ONCE(kvm->arch.pgd);
+ WRITE_ONCE(kvm->arch.pgd, NULL);
+ }
spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
Let me know if you could fix it up or I could send a fresh series. Sorry about that.
Suzuki
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list