[PATCH v2 12/18] arm64: dts: meson-gxbb-vega-s95: Fix node order

Neil Armstrong narmstrong at baylibre.com
Mon May 15 01:17:10 PDT 2017


On 05/13/2017 04:33 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Sort nodes referenced by label alphabetically.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber at suse.de>
> ---
>  v1 -> v2:
>  * Rebased (new nodes added)
>  
>  .../boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-vega-s95.dtsi      | 54 +++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-vega-s95.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-vega-s95.dtsi
> index f4bfee8e2e08..346753fb6324 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-vega-s95.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-vega-s95.dtsi
> @@ -111,18 +111,6 @@
>  	};
>  };
>  
> -&uart_AO {
> -	status = "okay";
> -	pinctrl-0 = <&uart_ao_a_pins>;
> -	pinctrl-names = "default";
> -};
> -
> -&ir {
> -	status = "okay";
> -	pinctrl-0 = <&remote_input_ao_pins>;
> -	pinctrl-names = "default";
> -};
> -
>  &ethmac {
>  	status = "okay";
>  	pinctrl-0 = <&eth_rgmii_pins>;
> @@ -149,21 +137,18 @@
>  	};
>  };
>  
> -&usb0_phy {
> -	status = "okay";
> -	phy-supply = <&usb_vbus>;
> -};
> -
> -&usb1_phy {
> -	status = "okay";
> -};
> -
> -&usb0 {
> +&ir {
>  	status = "okay";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&remote_input_ao_pins>;
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
>  };
>  
> -&usb1 {
> +&pwm_ef {
>  	status = "okay";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&pwm_e_pins>;
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	clocks = <&clkc CLKID_FCLK_DIV4>;
> +	clock-names = "clkin0";
>  };
>  
>  /* Wireless SDIO Module */
> @@ -229,10 +214,25 @@
>  	vmmcq-sumpply = <&vcc_1v8>;
>  };
>  
> -&pwm_ef {
> +&uart_AO {
>  	status = "okay";
> -	pinctrl-0 = <&pwm_e_pins>;
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&uart_ao_a_pins>;
>  	pinctrl-names = "default";
> -	clocks = <&clkc CLKID_FCLK_DIV4>;
> -	clock-names = "clkin0";
> +};
> +
> +&usb0_phy {
> +	status = "okay";
> +	phy-supply = <&usb_vbus>;
> +};
> +
> +&usb1_phy {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&usb0 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&usb1 {
> +	status = "okay";
>  };
> 

Hi Andreas,

Like a previous attempt, I'm not OK with such rework since it will break bisect and add complexity for new patches handling.

The order is not alphabetically ordered, live with it.

Neil



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list