[kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] syscalls: Verify address limit before returning to user-mode
Christoph Hellwig
hch at infradead.org
Fri May 12 01:07:41 PDT 2017
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:35:21AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 08:15:49AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > And converting everything to ->read_iter()/->write_iter() means an insane
> > amount of code churn, not to mention coping with random bogosities in
> > semantics. ->read() and ->write() are going to stay around, pretty
> > much indefinitely.
>
> But I don't think kernel users of them have to. I've been digging
> through the calllers and will send an analysis to the list in a bit.
Ok, here is the cleaned up list. The targets for in-kernel I/O
are basically regular files on normal fs, block devices, pipes
and sockets, with a few narrow exceptions and a few unclear cases.
I've added a few maintainers to Cc to clarify, and the list is below:
When looking at kernel_read/kernel_readv/kernel_write/__kernel_write
instances, or vfs_read/vfs_readv/vfs_write/vfs_writev inststances with
set_fs tricks most of them simply require a regular file on a "real"
fs or a block device, pipe, socket:
- various binary loaders: need to be regular files (+ on a "real" fs)
- nandsim: expect a regular file or maybe a block device
- code: expects a regular file
- ecryptfs: expects a regular file
- splice: can be a regular file or device file
- security/keys: regular file
- cachefiles: needs to be a regular file
- coredump: usually a regular file, but possibly a pipe
- acct: regular file
- target: regular file
- nfsd: regular file
- lustre: regular file
- f_mass_storage: regular file, or maybe block device
- autofs: pipe
- btrfs: regular file / pipe / socket
- ima: regular file on specific file systems
Then there are a few interesting ones with specific targets:
- sysctl: regular file on procfs
- mconsole: procfs as far as I can tell. Might be able to further
narrow it down?
- ashmem: regular file on shmem
The nommu mmap code needs to read everything that wants to support
a MAP_PRIVATE mmap, but as far as a I can tell: do a) address limits
not matter for nommu, and b) I have no f***cking idea why it doesn't
use readpage(s) to start with like the MMU code.
And a few that I can't figure:
- cx25821: no idea what this opens, need to confirm with the maintainers
(on Cc)
- 9p: not clear. looks like it might be sockets/pipes
Last but not least we have a driver that's a complete mess:
- series2002: /dev/tty* (drivers is in staging and needs to be rewritten
using the proper in-kernel APIs anyway)
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list