[PATCHv3 0/2] arm64: fix hotplug rwsem boot fallout
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Thu May 11 05:54:31 PDT 2017
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:01:21PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 11 May 2017, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:30:39AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Wed, 10 May 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > secondary_start_kernel()
> > > check_local_cpu_capabilities()
> > > update_cpu_errata_workarounds()
> > > update_cpu_capabilities()
> > > static_key_enable()
> > > __static_key_slow_inc()
> > > jump_label_lock()
> > > mutex_lock(&jump_label_mutex);
> > >
> > > How is that supposed to work?
> > >
> > > That call path is the low level CPU bringup, running in the context of the
> > > idle task of that CPU with interrupts and preemption disabled. Taking a
> > > mutex in that context, even if in that case the mutex is uncontended, is a
> > > NONO.
> > As an aside, do we have anything that should detect the broken mutex
> > usage? I've been testing kernels with LOCKDEP, PROVE_LOCKING,
> > DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP, and friends, and nothing has complained so far.
>
> Peter and myself were wondering about that already. No idea why that
> doesn't yell at you.
AFAICT, this happens early enough that system_state is SYSTEM_BOOTING.
In ___might_sleep(), we see this and bail out without a splat.
Thanks,
Mark.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list