[PATCH v3 2/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Do resource size checks based on SMMU
Robert Richter
robert.richter at cavium.com
Fri May 5 15:18:44 PDT 2017
On 05.05.17 17:38:06, Geetha sowjanya wrote:
> From: Linu Cherian <linu.cherian at cavium.com>
>
> With implementations supporting only page 0 register space,
> resource size can be 64k as well and hence perform size checks
> based on SMMU option PAGE0_REGS_ONLY.
>
> For this, arm_smmu_device_dt_probe/acpi_probe has been moved before
> platform_get_resource call, so that SMMU options are set beforehand.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linu Cherian <linu.cherian at cavium.com>
> Signed-off-by: Geetha Sowjanya <geethasowjanya.akula at cavium.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 107b4a6..f027676 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -2672,6 +2672,14 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static unsigned long arm_smmu_resource_size(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> + if (ARM_SMMU_PAGE0_REGS_ONLY(smmu))
> + return SZ_64K;
> + else
> + return SZ_128K;
> +}
> +
I think this can be dropped. See below.
> static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> int irq, ret;
> @@ -2688,9 +2696,17 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> smmu->dev = dev;
>
> + if (dev->of_node) {
> + ret = arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(pdev, smmu);
> + } else {
> + ret = arm_smmu_device_acpi_probe(pdev, smmu);
> + if (ret == -ENODEV)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> /* Base address */
> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> - if (resource_size(res) + 1 < SZ_128K) {
> + if (resource_size(res) + 1 < arm_smmu_resource_size(smmu)) {
> dev_err(dev, "MMIO region too small (%pr)\n", res);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
Why not just do the follwoing here:
/* Base address */
res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
if (resource_size(res) + 1 < arm_smmu_resource_size(smmu)) {
dev_err(dev, "MMIO region too small (%pr)\n", res);
return -EINVAL;
}
ioaddr = res->start;
+ /*
+ * Override the size, for Cavium ThunderX2 implementation
+ * which doesn't support the page 1 SMMU register space.
+ */
+ if (smmu->options & ARM_SMMU_OPT_PAGE0_REGS_ONLY)
+ res->end = res->size + SZ_64K -1;
+
smmu->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
if (IS_ERR(smmu->base))
return PTR_ERR(smmu->base);
Since we can drop patch #5 then, the fix would be isolated to this
file only. And we can use smmu->options as the onle check for this.
-Robert
> @@ -2717,14 +2733,6 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (irq > 0)
> smmu->gerr_irq = irq;
>
> - if (dev->of_node) {
> - ret = arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(pdev, smmu);
> - } else {
> - ret = arm_smmu_device_acpi_probe(pdev, smmu);
> - if (ret == -ENODEV)
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> /* Set bypass mode according to firmware probing result */
> bypass = !!ret;
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list