[PATCH v2] drivers:soc:fsl:qbman:qman.c: Sleep instead of stuck hacking jiffies.
Karim Eshapa
karim.eshapa at gmail.com
Thu May 4 23:01:54 PDT 2017
>On 5/4/2017 5:07 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 06:58 +0200, Karim Eshapa wrote:
>>> + stop = jiffies + 10000;
>>> + /*
>>> + * if MR was full and h/w had other FQRNI entries to produce, we
>>> + * need to allow it time to produce those entries once the
>>> + * existing entries are consumed. A worst-case situation
>>> + * (fully-loaded system) means h/w sequencers may have to do 3-4
>>> + * other things before servicing the portal's MR pump, each of
>>> + * which (if slow) may take ~50 qman cycles (which is ~200
>>> + * processor cycles). So rounding up and then multiplying this
>>> + * worst-case estimate by a factor of 10, just to be
>>> + * ultra-paranoid, goes as high as 10,000 cycles. NB, we consume
>>> + * one entry at a time, so h/w has an opportunity to produce new
>>> + * entries well before the ring has been fully consumed, so
>>> + * we're being *really* paranoid here.
>>> + */
>> OK, upon reading this more closely it seems the intent was to delay for 10,000
>> *processor cycles* and somehow that got turned into 10,000 jiffies (which is
>> 40 seconds at the default Hz!). We could just replace this whole thing with
>> msleep(1) and still be far more paranoid than was originally intended.
>>
>> Claudiu and Roy, any comments?
>Yes the timing here is certainly off, the code changed a few times since
>the comment was originally written.
>An msleep(1) seems reasonable here to me.
If the previous patch with msleep(1) is OK.
can I send a patch to slightly change the comments.
Thanks,
Karim
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list