Prototype of find_first_zero_bit in bitops.h
Mason
slash.tmp at free.fr
Fri Mar 31 10:58:07 PDT 2017
Top-posting to address relevance.
Is the proposed patch acceptable, or would it break
something I didn't foresee? Would "make allyesconfig"
or "make allmodconfig" flag potential issues?
Should I submit to the patch mill?
Regards.
On 29/03/2017 13:54, Mason wrote:
> Hello Russell,
>
> Just wanted to run something by you.
>
> In some driver code, I was passing the address of a u32 to
> find_first_zero_bit() and the maintainer smacked me, pointing
> out that find_first_zero_bit only accepted (unsigned long *)
>
> Would it make sense to change the prototype of
> _find_first_zero_bit_le()
> so that my mistake would be caught by the compiler like this:
>
> CC drivers/pci/host/pcie-tango.o
> In file included from ./include/linux/bitops.h:36:0,
> from ./include/linux/kernel.h:10,
> from ./include/linux/list.h:8,
> from ./include/linux/smp.h:11,
> from ./include/linux/irq.h:12,
> from ./include/linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h:21,
> from drivers/pci/host/pcie-tango.c:1:
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-tango.c: In function 'tango_irq_domain_alloc':
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-tango.c:122:28: error:
> passing argument 1 of '_find_first_zero_bit_le' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> pos = find_first_zero_bit(&mask, 32);
> ^
> ./arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h:199:59: note: in definition of macro 'find_first_zero_bit'
> #define find_first_zero_bit(p,sz) _find_first_zero_bit_le(p,sz)
> ^
> ./arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h:162:12: note: expected 'const long unsigned int *' but argument is of type 'u32 * {aka unsigned int *}'
> extern int _find_first_zero_bit_le(const unsigned long * p, unsigned size);
> ^
>
>
> Proposed trivial patch:
>
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h
> @@ -159,8 +159,8 @@ static inline void ____atomic_change_bit(unsigned int bit, volatile unsigned lon
> /*
> * Little endian assembly bitops. nr = 0 -> byte 0 bit 0.
> */
> -extern int _find_first_zero_bit_le(const void * p, unsigned size);
> -extern int _find_next_zero_bit_le(const void * p, int size, int offset);
> +extern int _find_first_zero_bit_le(const unsigned long *p, unsigned size);
> +extern int _find_next_zero_bit_le(const unsigned long *p, int size, int offset);
> extern int _find_first_bit_le(const unsigned long *p, unsigned size);
> extern int _find_next_bit_le(const unsigned long *p, int size, int offset);
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list