[PATCH v4 2/4] mvebu: xp: Add PWM properties to .dtsi files

Ralph Sennhauser ralph.sennhauser at gmail.com
Thu Mar 30 09:14:49 PDT 2017


On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:45:08 +0200
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement at free-electrons.com> wrote:

> Hi Ralph,
>  
>  On lun., mars 27 2017, Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> The title should start by ARM: dts: mvebu:
> 
> If there is no need to have a v5 then I wil take care of modifying the
> title while applying it.

Noted.

> 
> 
> > From: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch>
> >
> > Add properties to the GPIO nodes to allow them to be also used as
> > PWM lines.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch>
> > URL: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/427294/
> > [Ralph Sennhauser:
> >   * Use new compatible string marvell,armada-370-xp-gpio
> >   * Add missing reg-names / #pwm-cell properties to
> > armada-xp-mv78260.dtsi 'gpio1' node]
> > Signed-off-by: Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370.dtsi        | 16 +++++++++++-----
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp-mv78230.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++----
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp-mv78260.dtsi | 16 +++++++++++-----
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp-mv78460.dtsi | 16 +++++++++++-----
> >  4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370.dtsi index cc011c8..e30b076 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370.dtsi
> > @@ -137,29 +137,35 @@
> >  			};
> >  
> >  			gpio0: gpio at 18100 {
> > -				compatible = "marvell,orion-gpio";
> > -				reg = <0x18100 0x40>;
> > +				compatible =
> > "marvell,armada-370-xp-gpio";  
> 
> I think we should keep the "marvell,orion-gpio" too because the
> hardware is still compatible with it. Morever it will allow to use a
> recent dtb with an old kernel.

And it will remain compatible. Apart from not collecting compatible
strings there is no reason to drop them right now, so will add them back
for a (possible) v5.

Thanks
Ralph



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list