[PATCH v5 2/3] ARM: w90x900: let clk_disable() return immediately if clk is NULL

Arnd Bergmann arnd at arndb.de
Thu Mar 30 08:38:23 PDT 2017


On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro at socionext.com> wrote:
> In many of clk_disable() implementations, it is a no-op for a NULL
> pointer input, but this is one of the exceptions.
>
> Making it treewide consistent will allow clock consumers to call
> clk_disable() without NULL pointer check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com>
> Acked-by: Wan Zongshun <mcuos.com at gmail.com>
> ---

Applied to next/fixes-non-critical in arm-soc, I don't think anybody else
was going to apply it. Thanks!

     Arnd



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list