[PATCH v5 6/9] coresight: add support for CPU debug module
Leo Yan
leo.yan at linaro.org
Wed Mar 29 18:18:39 PDT 2017
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 04:17:19PM +0100, Mike Leach wrote:
[...]
> >> >+out_powered_up:
> >> >+ debug_os_unlock(drvdata);
> >>
> >> Question: Do we need a matching debug_os_lock() once we are done ?
> >
> > I have checked ARM ARMv8, but there have no detailed description for
> > this. I refered coresight-etmv4 code and Mike's pseudo code, ther have
> > no debug_os_lock() related operations.
> >
> > Mike, Mathieu, could you also help confirm this?
> >
>
> Debug OS lock / unlock allows the power management code running on the
> core to lock out the external debugger while the debug registers are
> saved/restored during a core power event.
>
> e.g. A sequence such as this might occur in a correctly programmed system....
>
> debug_os_lock()
> save_debug_regs() // visible from core power domain - incl breakpoints etc
> save_etm_regs()
> ... // other stuff prior to core power down,
> <power_down_core>
>
> Followed by...
>
> <power_up_core>
> restore_etm_regs()
> restore_debug_regs() // visible from core power domain - incl breakpoints etc
> debug_os_unlock()
>
> The value is 1 (locked) if cold resetting into AArch64 - it is
> expected that some system software will set this to 0 as part of the
> boot process.
> The lock prevents write access to the external debug registers so we
> need to clear it to set up the external debug registers we are using.
This description is conflict with upper restoring flows. During
restore_debug_regs(), the os lock is locked so how it can write
external debug register to restore context?
> This suggests that it should be restored as we found it when done.
Thanks,
Leo Yan
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list