[PATCH 00/15] arm64/kvm: use common sysreg definitions
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Wed Mar 29 02:55:32 PDT 2017
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:41:47AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:29:31PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 07:48:28PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 06:35:13PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > I think it would make sense for those to be in a common branch taken by
> > > both the arm64 and KVM trees, with the KVM-specific parts being taken by
> > > KVM alone atop of that.
> > >
> > > Would everyone be happy with that?
> >
> > I'm happy with that.
> >
> > > For reference, I've updated my branches so that arm64/common-sysreg only
> > > contains the common parts, with the KVM parts atop of that in
> > > kvm/common-sysreg.
> >
> > Will, Catalin: Let me know if you're going to pull from common-sysreg
> > and I'll do the same and add the kvm patches above.
>
> I think that's what we'll do, but Catalin's out this week (we're taking it
> in turns to go to work). I'd say go ahead and pull it into kvm if there
> aren't any conflicts. No need to wait for us.
>
> Mark -- those branches are stable, right?
They are now. I will not touch either branch.
Thanks,
Mark.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list