[PATCH V9 00/11] IOMMU probe deferral support
Sricharan R
sricharan at codeaurora.org
Tue Mar 28 09:07:59 PDT 2017
Hi,
On 3/28/2017 7:45 PM, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sricharan R [mailto:sricharan at codeaurora.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 5:54 AM
>> To: Robin Murphy; Shameerali Kolothum Thodi; Wangzhou (B);
>> will.deacon at arm.com; joro at 8bytes.org; lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com;
>> iommu at lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
>> linux-arm-msm at vger.kernel.org; m.szyprowski at samsung.com;
>> bhelgaas at google.com; linux-pci at vger.kernel.org; linux-
>> acpi at vger.kernel.org; tn at semihalf.com; hanjun.guo at linaro.org;
>> okaya at codeaurora.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 00/11] IOMMU probe deferral support
>>
>> Hi,
>>
> [...]
>
>>>>> From the logs its clear that when ixgbevf driver originally probes
>>>>> and adds the device to smmu the dma mask is 32, but when it binds
>>>>> to vfio-pci, it becomes 64 bit.
>>>>
>>>> Just to add to that, the mask is set to 64 bit in the ixgebvf driver
>>>> probe[1]
>>>
>>> Aha, but of course it's still the same struct device getting bound to
>>> VFIO later, so whatever mask the first driver set is still in there
>>> when we go through of_dma_configure() the second time (and the fact
>>> that we go through more than once being the new behaviour). So yes,
>>> this is a legitimate problem and we really do need to be robust
>>> against size overflow. I reckon the below tweak of your fix is
>>> probably the way to go; cleaning up the arch_setup_dma_ops() interface
>> can happen later.
>>>
>>
>> ok, i will add this fix separately and also the acpi fix that lorenzo has
>> suggested in patch #8 in to the series after testing confirmation.
>>
> I can confirm that the patches fixes the issues reported here . Both
> DT and ACPI works now.
>
Thanks for the testing. Will repost with the fixes.
Regards,
Sricharan
--
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list