[PATCH 05/12] ARM: dts: imx6ul-isiot-common: Add touchscreen node

[Jagan Teki]

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Shawn Guo <shawnguo at kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:29:49PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Shawn Guo <shawnguo at kernel.org> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:18:10PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> >> From: Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>
>> >>
>> >> Add touchscreen node as i2c1 slave device on Engicam Is.IoT MX6UL
>> >> modules, the touchscreen controlled 'st,stmpe-ts' connected via
>> >> i2c with st,stmpe811 mfb interface.
>> >
>> > s/mfb/mfd?
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo at kernel.org>
>> >> Cc: Matteo Lisi <matteo.lisi at engicam.com>
>> >> Cc: Michael Trimarchi <michael at amarulasolutions.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-isiot-common.dtsi | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-isiot-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-isiot-common.dtsi
>> >> index 9660e20..b149b5e 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-isiot-common.dtsi
>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-isiot-common.dtsi
>> >> @@ -40,6 +40,34 @@
>> >>   *     OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
>> >>   */
>> >>
>> >> +&i2c1 {
>> >> +     touch: stmpe811 at 44 {
>> >
>> > Label a MFD device 'touch'?  Also, the node name should be generic.  Not
>> > sure what should be used for MFD device though.
>>
>> May be I can use stmpe811 at 41 the existing imx6qdl-apalis.dtsi using
>> the similar notation.
>
> Per application notes of stmpe811 below, I would suggest you name it
> gpio-expander.
>
> www.st.com/resource/zh/datasheet/CD00186725.pdf

OK, will this be ok?

stmpe811: gpio-expander at 44 {

>
>>
>> >
>> >> +             compatible = "st,stmpe811";
>> >> +             reg = <0x44>;
>> >> +             #address-cells = <1>;
>> >> +             #size-cells = <0>;
>> >> +             pinctrl-names = "default";
>> >> +             pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_stmpe_ts>;
>> >
>> > If this is for stmpe-ts, shouldn't be put into touchscreen child node?
>>
>> Actually this is interrupt pad, for the touch controller via stmpe so
>> I can rename pinctrl_touch_int.
>
> Or just pinctrl_stmpe.
>
>>
>> >
>> >> +             interrupt-parent = <&gpio1>;
>> >> +             interrupts = <18 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
>> >> +             interrupt-controller;
>> >> +             #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>> >> +
>> >> +             stmpe_touchscreen {
>> >
>> > 'stmpe: touchscreen {' might be better.
>>
>> stmpe_touchscreen {
>>
>> This is also compatible with existing dtsi files
>
> We do not need to keep compatibility with something not good.

thanks!
-- 
Jagan Teki
Senior Linux Kernel Engineer | Amarula Solutions
U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer
Hyderabad, India.