[PATCH v33 07/14] arm64: hibernate: preserve kdump image around hibernation
AKASHI Takahiro
takahiro.akashi at linaro.org
Thu Mar 23 04:29:30 PDT 2017
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:25:46PM +0000, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Akashi,
>
> On 15/03/17 09:59, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > Since arch_kexec_protect_crashkres() removes a mapping for crash dump
> > kernel image, the loaded data won't be preserved around hibernation.
> >
> > In this patch, helper functions, kexec_prepare_suspend()/
> > kexec_post_resume(), are additionally called before/after hibernation so
> > that the relevant memory segments will be mapped again and preserved just
> > as the others are.
> >
> > In addition, to minimize the size of hibernation image,
> > kexec_is_chraskres_nosave() is added to pfn_is_nosave() in order to
>
> (crashkres)
Yes.
> > recoginize only the pages that hold loaded crash dump kernel image as
>
> (recognize)
Ah, yes ...
> > saveable. Hibernation excludes any pages that are marked as Reserved and
> > yet "nosave."
>
>
> Neat! I didn't think this would be possible without hacking kernel/power/snapshot.c.
>
> I've given this a spin on Juno and Seattle, I even added debug_pagealloc, but
> that doesn't trick it because your kexec_prepare_suspend() puts the mapping back.
>
> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse at arm.com>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
>
> Some nits about comments:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hibernate.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/hibernate.c
> > index 97a7384100f3..1e10fafa59bd 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hibernate.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hibernate.c
> > @@ -286,6 +288,9 @@ int swsusp_arch_suspend(void)
> > local_dbg_save(flags);
> >
> > if (__cpu_suspend_enter(&state)) {
> > + /* make the crash dump kernel image visible/saveable */
> > + kexec_prepare_suspend();
>
> Strictly this is kdump not kexec, but the comment makes that clear.
I hesitated to use "kdump_" here as there are no functions with
such a prefix (say, even arch_kexec_protect_crashkres()).
So probably "crash_" or "crash_kexec_" would sound much better.
> > +
> > sleep_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > ret = swsusp_save();
> > } else {
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> > index 02e4f929db3b..82f48db589cf 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
>
> > @@ -220,7 +221,6 @@ void arch_kexec_protect_crashkres(void)
> > kexec_crash_image->segment[i].memsz,
> > PAGE_KERNEL_INVALID, true);
> >
> > -
>
> Stray whitespace change from a previous patch?
Oops, fix it.
> > flush_tlb_all();
> > }
> >
> > @@ -233,3 +233,74 @@ void arch_kexec_unprotect_crashkres(void)
>
> > +/*
> > + * kexec_is_crashres_nosave
> > + *
> > + * Return true only if a page is part of reserved memory for crash dump kernel,
> > + * but does not hold any data of loaded kernel image.
> > + *
> > + * Note that all the pages in crash dump kernel memory have been initially
> > + * marked as Reserved in kexec_reserve_crashkres_pages().
> > + *
> > + * In hibernation, the pages which are Reserved and yet "nosave"
> > + * are excluded from the hibernation iamge. kexec_is_crashkres_nosave()
> > + * does this check for crash dump kernel and will reduce the total size
> > + * of hibernation image.
> > + */
> > +
> > +bool kexec_is_crashkres_nosave(unsigned long pfn)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > + phys_addr_t addr;
> > +
> > + /* in reserved memory? */
>
> Comment in the wrong place?
This is after my deep thinking :) but
>
> > + if (!crashk_res.end)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + addr = __pfn_to_phys(pfn);
>
> (makes more sense here)
if you think so, I will follow you.
>
> > + if ((addr < crashk_res.start) || (crashk_res.end < addr))
> > + return false;
> > +
>
> > + /* not part of loaded kernel image? */
>
> Comment in the wrong place?
>
>
> > + if (!kexec_crash_image)
> > + return true;
> > +
>
> (makes more sense here)
ditto
>
> > + for (i = 0; i < kexec_crash_image->nr_segments; i++)
> > + if (addr >= kexec_crash_image->segment[i].mem &&
> > + addr < (kexec_crash_image->segment[i].mem +
> > + kexec_crash_image->segment[i].memsz))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
Thank you for your review!
-Takahiro AKASHI
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list