[PATCH v3 14/19] KVM: arm64: ITS: Add infrastructure for table lookup

Andre Przywara andre.przywara at arm.com
Tue Mar 21 11:12:40 PDT 2017


Hi,

On 06/03/17 11:34, Eric Auger wrote:
> Add a generic lookup_table() helper whose role consists in
> scanning a contiguous table located in guest RAM and applying
> a callback on each entry. Entries can be handled as linked lists
> since the callback may return an offset to the next entry and
> also tell that an entry is the last one.
> 
> Helper functions also are added to compute the device/event ID
> offset to the next DTE/ITE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger at redhat.com>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 119 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> index 1cd6ae6..cf04776 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> @@ -181,6 +181,8 @@ static struct its_ite *find_ite(struct vgic_its *its, u32 device_id,
>  #define VITS_ESZ 8
>  #define VITS_TYPER_IDBITS 0xF
>  #define VITS_TYPER_DEVBITS 0xF
> +#define VITS_DTE_MAX_DEVID_OFFSET GENMASK(19, 0)
> +#define VITS_ITE_MAX_EVENTID_OFFSET GENMASK(16, 0)

GENMASK here is a bit misleading, I think (BIT(20) - 1) would be
clearer, wouldn't it?

>  
>  /*
>   * Finds and returns a collection in the ITS collection table.
> @@ -1607,6 +1609,123 @@ int vgic_its_attr_regs_access(struct kvm_device *dev,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static u32 compute_next_devid_offset(struct list_head *h,
> +				     struct its_device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct list_head *e = &dev->dev_list;
> +	struct its_device *next;
> +	u32 next_offset;
> +
> +	if (e->next == h)
> +		return 0;
> +	next = list_entry(e->next, struct its_device, dev_list);
> +	next_offset = next->device_id - dev->device_id;
> +
> +	return next_offset < VITS_DTE_MAX_DEVID_OFFSET ?
> +			next_offset : VITS_DTE_MAX_DEVID_OFFSET;

	return min(next_offset, VITS_DTE_MAX_DEVID_OFFSET);

> +}
> +
> +static u32 compute_next_eventid_offset(struct list_head *h,
> +				       struct its_ite *ite)
> +{
> +	struct list_head *e = &ite->ite_list;
> +	struct its_ite *next;
> +	u32 next_offset;
> +
> +	if (e->next == h)
> +		return 0;
> +	next = list_entry(e->next, struct its_ite, ite_list);
> +	next_offset = next->event_id - ite->event_id;
> +
> +	return next_offset < VITS_ITE_MAX_EVENTID_OFFSET ?
> +			next_offset : VITS_ITE_MAX_EVENTID_OFFSET;

	return min(next_offset, VITS_ITE_MAX_EVENTID_OFFSET);

> +}
> +
> +static int next_segment(unsigned long len, int offset)

Isn't "segment" a page, really? And thus should be named like this?

> +{
> +	if (len > PAGE_SIZE - offset)
> +		return PAGE_SIZE - offset;
> +	else
> +		return len;
> +}

Can be: return min(len, PAGE_SIZE - offset); which means it could be a
macro even.

> +
> +/**
> + * entry_fn_t - Callback called on a table entry restore path
> + * @its: its handle
> + * @id: id of the entry
> + * @addr: kernel VA of the entry
> + * @opaque: pointer to an opaque data
> + * @next_offset: minimal ID offset to the next entry. 0 if this
> + * entry is the last one, 1 if the entry is invalid, >= 1 if an
> + * entry's next_offset field was truly decoded
> + *
> + * Return: < 0 on error, 0 otherwise
> + */
> +typedef int (*entry_fn_t)(struct vgic_its *its, u32 id, void *addr,
> +			  void *opaque, u32 *next_offset);
> +
> +/**
> + * lookup_table - scans a contiguous table in guest RAM and applies a function
> + * to each entry
> + *
> + * @its: its handle
> + * @base: base gpa of the table
> + * @size: size of the table in bytes
> + * @esz: entry size in bytes
> + * @start_id: first entry's ID
> + * @fn: function to apply on each entry
> + *
> + * Return: < 0 on error, 1 if last element identified, 0 otherwise
> + */
> +static int lookup_table(struct vgic_its *its, gpa_t base, int size, int esz,

   ^^^^^^
Won't this trigger a build warning when building at this patch only?

The rest looks fine.

Cheers,
Andre


> +			int start_id, entry_fn_t fn, void *opaque)
> +{
> +	gpa_t gpa = base, top = base + size - 1;
> +	unsigned long len = top - gpa;
> +	int ret, seg, offset = offset_in_page(gpa);
> +	gfn_t gfn = gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	u32 id = start_id + (gpa - base)/esz;
> +	struct kvm *kvm = its->dev->kvm;
> +	kvm_pfn_t pfn;
> +
> +	while ((seg = next_segment(len, offset)) != 0) {
> +		u32 next_offset;
> +		bool writeable;
> +		void *addr;
> +
> +		pfn = gfn_to_pfn_prot(kvm, gfn, true, &writeable);
> +		if (is_error_noslot_pfn(pfn))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		addr = phys_to_virt((u64)pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
> +		addr += offset;
> +
> +		while (seg > 0) {
> +			size_t byte_offset;
> +
> +			ret = fn(its, id, addr, opaque, &next_offset);
> +			if (ret < 0 || (!ret && !next_offset))
> +				goto out;
> +
> +			byte_offset = next_offset * esz;
> +
> +			id += next_offset;
> +			gpa += byte_offset;
> +			addr += byte_offset;
> +			seg -= byte_offset;
> +		}
> +		kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> +
> +		len = top - gpa;
> +		offset = offset_in_page(gpa);
> +		gfn = gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +		id = start_id + (gpa - base)/esz;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +out:
> +	kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> +	return (ret < 0 ? ret : 1);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * vgic_its_flush_pending_tables - Flush the pending tables into guest RAM
>   */
> 



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list